Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-cassandra-user-archive@www.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-cassandra-user-archive@www.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id A9006E086 for ; Tue, 19 Feb 2013 09:29:51 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 65582 invoked by uid 500); 19 Feb 2013 09:29:49 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-cassandra-user-archive@cassandra.apache.org Received: (qmail 65356 invoked by uid 500); 19 Feb 2013 09:29:49 -0000 Mailing-List: contact user-help@cassandra.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: user@cassandra.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list user@cassandra.apache.org Received: (qmail 65336 invoked by uid 99); 19 Feb 2013 09:29:48 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 19 Feb 2013 09:29:48 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.5 required=5.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of haithem.jarraya@struq.com designates 209.85.128.176 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.128.176] (HELO mail-ve0-f176.google.com) (209.85.128.176) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 19 Feb 2013 09:29:41 +0000 Received: by mail-ve0-f176.google.com with SMTP id cz10so5542423veb.21 for ; Tue, 19 Feb 2013 01:29:19 -0800 (PST) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:x-received:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type:x-gm-message-state; bh=Ugd6eLhim/2CrBRjeA/lOe91CJVlMiI+zltWg/frC1s=; b=dAV3FUEuxfBMi9ak4MIvXhJRcE+3VqADdoS9qWJLiO0spWFPPH/Is3OsCR1DAL0lUz RrbubCRFBa+eRLsrAdk4BidHcUgFSR0wViLeYvabVM3j19vTXaVPsXUaPS4+3yUVMF52 B/Vt7q1GLqnE+DUVq8daikwLxWsPqTxLNd4jsh2EuRaIiBLDzA8bH8zL9T8LDmfcP7Jd Z7PX5JOh0MdEFJF5vk928HEoXh+HXKDmyoXDRtbhX4rW4xbf0gTN/OOVeYdgGzrlfMrP 125jioa2iMjgsy+RaFYVk+JG01+8C33xyIQn0rmxI8mdW2YGQ3iDCX1zPeAO71jY3m8p HHBg== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.58.145.106 with SMTP id st10mr20161017veb.39.1361266159542; Tue, 19 Feb 2013 01:29:19 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.58.230.41 with HTTP; Tue, 19 Feb 2013 01:29:19 -0800 (PST) Date: Tue, 19 Feb 2013 09:29:19 +0000 Message-ID: Subject: Long running nodetool repair From: Haithem Jarraya To: user@cassandra.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=047d7b5d88efe2633304d61079d3 X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQkZ9ABzIq9SoEnJ5MuKAQMfwSPGm5ypTsCWEiFNAEkSqnmfJnX0aTz8HbdHVktrV/eVcJFJ X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --047d7b5d88efe2633304d61079d3 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Hi, I am new to Cassandra and I am not sure if this is the normal behavior but nodetool repair runs for too long even for small dataset per node. As I am writing I started a nodetool repair last night at 18:41 and now it's 9:18 and it's still running, the size of my data is only ~500mb per node. We have 3 Node cluster in DC1 with RF 3 1 Node Cluster in DC2 with RF 1 1 Node cluster in DC3 with RF 1 and running Cassandra V1.2.1 with 256 vNodes. >From cassandra logs I do not see AntiEntropy logs anymore only compaction Task and FlushWriter. Is this a normal behaviour of nodetool repair? Is the running time grow linearly with the size of the data? Any help or direction will be much appreciated. Thanks, H --047d7b5d88efe2633304d61079d3 Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Hi,

I am new to Cassandra and I a= m not sure if this is the normal=A0behavior=A0but nodetool repair runs for = too long even for small dataset per node. As I am writing I started a nodet= ool repair last night at 18:41 and now it's 9:18 and it's still run= ning, the size of my data is only ~500mb per node.
We have
3 Node cluster in DC1 with RF 3
1 Node Cluster in DC2 with RF 1
1 Node cluster in D= C3 with RF 1

and running Cassandra V1.= 2.1 with 256 vNodes.

From cassandra logs I do not see AntiEntrop= y logs anymore only compaction Task and FlushWriter.

Is this a normal behaviour of nodetool repair?
Is the running time grow linearly with the size of the data?

Any help or direction will be much appreciated.


Thanks,

H
--047d7b5d88efe2633304d61079d3--