Return-Path: 
 <user-return-29811-apmail-cassandra-user-archive=cassandra.apache.org@cassandra.apache.org>
X-Original-To: apmail-cassandra-user-archive@www.apache.org
Delivered-To: apmail-cassandra-user-archive@www.apache.org
Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3])
	by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id A36FEDAE9
	for <apmail-cassandra-user-archive@www.apache.org>;
 Tue, 30 Oct 2012 18:09:50 +0000 (UTC)
Received: (qmail 42091 invoked by uid 500); 30 Oct 2012 18:09:48 -0000
Delivered-To: apmail-cassandra-user-archive@cassandra.apache.org
Received: (qmail 42007 invoked by uid 500); 30 Oct 2012 18:09:48 -0000
Mailing-List: contact user-help@cassandra.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:user-help@cassandra.apache.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:user-unsubscribe@cassandra.apache.org>
List-Post: <mailto:user@cassandra.apache.org>
List-Id: <user.cassandra.apache.org>
Reply-To: user@cassandra.apache.org
Delivered-To: mailing list user@cassandra.apache.org
Received: (qmail 41999 invoked by uid 99); 30 Oct 2012 18:09:48 -0000
Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136)
    by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 30 Oct 2012 18:09:48 +0000
X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.2 required=5.0
	tests=HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_NEUTRAL
X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org
Received-SPF: neutral (athena.apache.org: local policy)
Received: from [209.85.215.44] (HELO mail-la0-f44.google.com) (209.85.215.44)
    by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 30 Oct 2012 18:09:41 +0000
Received: by mail-la0-f44.google.com with SMTP id b11so470515lam.31
        for <user@cassandra.apache.org>; Tue, 30 Oct 2012 11:09:19 -0700 (PDT)
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=google.com; s=20120113;
        h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type
         :x-gm-message-state;
        bh=9KuWB+xVg8i5Eeo8p4+F5jemKPH72RcgV2qI/z/zHS0=;
        b=HS0JnTdsfkYj3kJSln3SYcyqA2xosogEZDA0cNVts+zUY7M3k4cXvxQrK+47z+WBcN
         vZOKFypCJdsRv9F0tBrrt/fN9QKD+Z3LS88KLc7cUqT1l32HdDk9jt8OfKPlBIJYuTfa
         7FtAPnS8x/bYN1v+vh/4NOYzCylULwW0ECxEsxlxZ4kYDVlUeHwA+RiapbGllreRvp6S
         hBPM3mGMmCdAHZfv8xsj5cfqmwc88pCkmUljaQaMNaG/SiH7ZaF6/IpgTpS4uWCjLI6U
         UIb9UpHmQ5PtjGDakfXNW63cg3qk0UyqCzNjvc6hhv7KYZDt9lvMbpIMBV5OHtkvdoky
         xBdA==
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.152.106.162 with SMTP id gv2mr30667426lab.14.1351620559819;
 Tue, 30 Oct 2012 11:09:19 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.112.79.78 with HTTP; Tue, 30 Oct 2012 11:09:19 -0700 (PDT)
Date: Tue, 30 Oct 2012 14:09:19 -0400
Message-ID: 
 <CAF9x2_dELF6S8zy2XXW=GHE25pmMVQAEpbx=D4yEU2PSKq833Q@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: my ubunutu system has "fuseblk" filesystem, would it go faster if I
 changed it to EXT4?
From: Brian Tarbox <tarbox@cabotresearch.com>
To: user@cassandra.apache.org
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=f46d04083aa556d19204cd4aaf32
X-Gm-Message-State: 
 ALoCoQnshemL7n3glyA34eFqsv3UO9JWMhS90MsS6kM2EAhVKMTsSoKKt8gUxEqniHsP74lCCwnC
X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org

--f46d04083aa556d19204cd4aaf32
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1

I got some new ubuntu servers to add to my cluster and found that the file
system is "fuseblk" which really means NTFS.

All else being equal would I expect to get any performance boost if I
converted the file system to EXT4?  Edward Capriolo's "Cookbook" book seems
to suggest so.

Thanks.

Brian Tarbox

--f46d04083aa556d19204cd4aaf32
Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

I got some new ubuntu servers to add to my cluster and found that the file =
system is &quot;fuseblk&quot; which really means NTFS.<div><br></div><div>A=
ll else being equal would I expect to get any performance boost if I conver=
ted the file system to EXT4? =A0Edward Capriolo&#39;s &quot;Cookbook&quot; =
book seems to suggest so.</div>
<div><br></div><div>Thanks.</div><div><br></div><div>Brian Tarbox</div>

--f46d04083aa556d19204cd4aaf32--