Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-cassandra-user-archive@www.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-cassandra-user-archive@www.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id C6C9199AA for ; Sat, 11 Aug 2012 20:43:23 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 68623 invoked by uid 500); 11 Aug 2012 20:43:21 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-cassandra-user-archive@cassandra.apache.org Received: (qmail 68597 invoked by uid 500); 11 Aug 2012 20:43:21 -0000 Mailing-List: contact user-help@cassandra.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: user@cassandra.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list user@cassandra.apache.org Received: (qmail 68589 invoked by uid 99); 11 Aug 2012 20:43:21 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 11 Aug 2012 20:43:21 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.5 required=5.0 tests=FSL_RCVD_USER,HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of tyler@datastax.com designates 209.85.212.44 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.212.44] (HELO mail-vb0-f44.google.com) (209.85.212.44) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 11 Aug 2012 20:43:16 +0000 Received: by vbbez10 with SMTP id ez10so2726911vbb.31 for ; Sat, 11 Aug 2012 13:42:55 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type:x-gm-message-state; bh=e6KUTYnDrp0OYS/req0p+96SF8wXBnkch62hsXqeeSo=; b=EtcJRvr/50MBoZRVPNsQBw1ZJzQaxWEUywM1bJyd5W7cF/efmUVB7UAm+WydKtNsfd tvNRcRO9S9Shy6vf7FaxCDNQdT3cjxcnK33pimU41O+ogKbCM/gBBanfyhlwF6BZyQ6u OL68kD7SBmtviU7GA/gkhESxb5WT1wi1UORQO0EalKAZExRe+0bpZPHZo432fTKY0LzR +udgHPuMRYBMEGVDnEB504NeWTyQTKvdfJO4FEmgAPLD3Mmy2F/OM9UOHzwUpmasnNaR DB0xocoE65HSMum0xM8erLmfc3O+ZRfuQcBbSf61WlDlJ8OzPP9i9YbHGJg/iOXMoOse LdpA== MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.52.35.15 with SMTP id d15mr4820768vdj.128.1344717775198; Sat, 11 Aug 2012 13:42:55 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.58.172.72 with HTTP; Sat, 11 Aug 2012 13:42:55 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Sat, 11 Aug 2012 15:42:55 -0500 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Project Management From: Tyler Hobbs To: user@cassandra.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=20cf307ac79b50592e04c70381d9 X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQnHHyZvo8SwekQJ3akPYVj5XhENPDwLGYi8aOic9t7DSbPsE2/GP3cpqH6BSSagHdzqKw6v X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --20cf307ac79b50592e04c70381d9 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 On Tue, Aug 7, 2012 at 2:32 AM, Baskar Sikkayan wrote: > > If i create one more column family based on my query instead of going with > secondary index, > Will it affect the write performance? > It won't affect writes much more than the built-in secondary indexes would, and you'll get better read performance. > Since i need to duplicate the data in the second column family as well > while writing data, Will it hit write performance? Same answer. -- Tyler Hobbs DataStax --20cf307ac79b50592e04c70381d9 Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
On Tue, Aug 7, 2012 at 2:32 AM, Baskar Sikkayan = <baskar.sks@gmail.com> wrote:

If i create one more column family based on my query instead of going w= ith secondary index,
Will it affect the write performance?

It won't affect writes much more than the built-in secondar= y indexes would, and you'll get better read performance.
=A0
Since i need to = duplicate the data in the second column family as well while writing data, = Will it hit write performance?

Same answer.

--
= Tyler Hobbs
DataStax
<= br> --20cf307ac79b50592e04c70381d9--