From user-return-27066-apmail-cassandra-user-archive=cassandra.apache.org@cassandra.apache.org  Mon Jun 18 17:19:30 2012
Return-Path: <user-return-27066-apmail-cassandra-user-archive=cassandra.apache.org@cassandra.apache.org>
X-Original-To: apmail-cassandra-user-archive@www.apache.org
Delivered-To: apmail-cassandra-user-archive@www.apache.org
Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3])
	by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id D76AF96F4
	for <apmail-cassandra-user-archive@www.apache.org>; Mon, 18 Jun 2012 17:19:30 +0000 (UTC)
Received: (qmail 14716 invoked by uid 500); 18 Jun 2012 17:19:28 -0000
Delivered-To: apmail-cassandra-user-archive@cassandra.apache.org
Received: (qmail 14644 invoked by uid 500); 18 Jun 2012 17:19:28 -0000
Mailing-List: contact user-help@cassandra.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:user-help@cassandra.apache.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:user-unsubscribe@cassandra.apache.org>
List-Post: <mailto:user@cassandra.apache.org>
List-Id: <user.cassandra.apache.org>
Reply-To: user@cassandra.apache.org
Delivered-To: mailing list user@cassandra.apache.org
Received: (qmail 14592 invoked by uid 99); 18 Jun 2012 17:19:26 -0000
Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136)
    by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 18 Jun 2012 17:19:26 +0000
X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.5 required=5.0
	tests=FSL_RCVD_USER,HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS
X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org
Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of cyril.auburtin@gmail.com designates 209.85.161.172 as permitted sender)
Received: from [209.85.161.172] (HELO mail-gg0-f172.google.com) (209.85.161.172)
    by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 18 Jun 2012 17:19:20 +0000
Received: by ggnc4 with SMTP id c4so4288827ggn.31
        for <user@cassandra.apache.org>; Mon, 18 Jun 2012 10:18:59 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
        h=mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to:content-type;
        bh=zIsxxhqXlSWePruUHHuX6AhB/ySgmW7NF6RJM37HEzg=;
        b=GoIy6aqWKD4we3A+Ju9PUsaAkFpes56sFsGJWqjdWJdy4j3b13pWSFhhuUzZaRtzy3
         gyc04gumKES8IPsQgNbVYoNFBB4W4VbTLqc10UkRJBv3jcvKAbnPoGyqhhZmBcNzLsEu
         NySVIyM8kwdLlQuX7PQCwkEuP9pSTS0AtS6Fo9SDMEm/qG6lIbD4pUZRS0OwTn8PBK8r
         tSI8v88OVY7eNwf0zCrzCFNL30lBJvaRqhW17G4c5DwDHH2HLjUtx/MtRJNdaHBdAEo9
         a+5BrlyuJgJm6E3088OSUkHiuPV+D1tLV3YIZeCjmAi4KYxiqlRXEOuSiHuT5zOkMPcZ
         wdMA==
Received: by 10.236.76.233 with SMTP id b69mr19301474yhe.52.1340039939697;
 Mon, 18 Jun 2012 10:18:59 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.100.195.2 with HTTP; Mon, 18 Jun 2012 10:18:39 -0700 (PDT)
From: Cyril Auburtin <cyril.auburtin@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 18 Jun 2012 19:18:39 +0200
Message-ID: <CAKteAhHQ-SmZfGO9zq3=Q4mL4eV+zCOZMT9cZPzgDmpOJp3bww@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: large Rows Vs multinodes ring
To: user@cassandra.apache.org
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=20cf300fb371972ba404c2c25c09
X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org

--20cf300fb371972ba404c2c25c09
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1

In what extent, having possibly large rows, (many columns (sorted as
timeststamp, or geohash or ...) will be nefast for a muli-node ring.
I guess a row can be read/write just on one node, if yes it's more likely
to fail, (than having one row per timestamp ..)

thanks for explanations

--20cf300fb371972ba404c2c25c09
Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

In what extent, having possibly large rows, (many columns (sorted as timest=
stamp, or geohash or ...) will be nefast for a muli-node ring.<div>I guess =
a row can be read/write just on one node, if yes it&#39;s more likely to fa=
il, (than having one row per timestamp ..)</div>

<div><br></div><div>thanks for explanations</div>

--20cf300fb371972ba404c2c25c09--