From user-return-26176-apmail-cassandra-user-archive=cassandra.apache.org@cassandra.apache.org  Wed May 16 02:09:32 2012
Return-Path: <user-return-26176-apmail-cassandra-user-archive=cassandra.apache.org@cassandra.apache.org>
X-Original-To: apmail-cassandra-user-archive@www.apache.org
Delivered-To: apmail-cassandra-user-archive@www.apache.org
Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3])
	by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 3E88096C5
	for <apmail-cassandra-user-archive@www.apache.org>; Wed, 16 May 2012 02:09:32 +0000 (UTC)
Received: (qmail 67072 invoked by uid 500); 16 May 2012 02:09:30 -0000
Delivered-To: apmail-cassandra-user-archive@cassandra.apache.org
Received: (qmail 67048 invoked by uid 500); 16 May 2012 02:09:30 -0000
Mailing-List: contact user-help@cassandra.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:user-help@cassandra.apache.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:user-unsubscribe@cassandra.apache.org>
List-Post: <mailto:user@cassandra.apache.org>
List-Id: <user.cassandra.apache.org>
Reply-To: user@cassandra.apache.org
Delivered-To: mailing list user@cassandra.apache.org
Received: (qmail 67037 invoked by uid 99); 16 May 2012 02:09:29 -0000
Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230)
    by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 16 May 2012 02:09:29 +0000
X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.5 required=5.0
	tests=HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS
X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org
Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of yulinyen@gmail.com designates 209.85.212.172 as permitted sender)
Received: from [209.85.212.172] (HELO mail-wi0-f172.google.com) (209.85.212.172)
    by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 16 May 2012 02:09:22 +0000
Received: by wibhj8 with SMTP id hj8so2598628wib.7
        for <user@cassandra.apache.org>; Tue, 15 May 2012 19:09:02 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
        h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type;
        bh=DsRdMjNqsC3cccCRCCHtLzxPKtXcrGJjEmf7tjyz8uo=;
        b=Wu4il4mwTsUL2jQBv17HTWcC5R19gjOrVMoxTet5okfMD26DPa9A4CHlnlIRZ8EYL7
         uzMefiwaPatLXkiOrTzG8CH+MATWbSaBwew2lEeojI75GiLK3jsGuuGIqVWFKwGBzYuy
         fyw3shm7CjMIFWIV3C+dUNwoim2I639An/UCXzsRhg/0y5ytPMjgsXUti8kj1RRxLUQW
         dGuhxADrwe6G2/f2dTQxg06T1f3u3Lx88jT5cKEAgwtI/HZxIX+oCMLaywwTyOZPbeec
         IhVs6qGy80tE00a8XqiuMD08d9HByINsM4IuQPMPDamcyl2AFwWDD7CQzZ1brbx+pq6y
         kBqw==
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.216.135.234 with SMTP id u84mr755451wei.108.1337134142227;
 Tue, 15 May 2012 19:09:02 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.223.88.20 with HTTP; Tue, 15 May 2012 19:09:02 -0700 (PDT)
Date: Wed, 16 May 2012 10:09:02 +0800
Message-ID: <CAAaMp53bvsJAAdGsVPQrc861SkvzpJ=PoUT7bAJWf_wx4T05ig@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Is nodetool upgradesstables a necessary step for upgrading from 0.8
 to 1.0.
From: Boris Yen <yulinyen@gmail.com>
To: user@cassandra.apache.org
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=0016e6dd98969085be04c01dcdad

--0016e6dd98969085be04c01dcdad
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1

Hi,

Our cluster is currently running on 0.8.10, we plan on upgrading it to
1.0.x. We read the document from the datastax website, the final step is to
use nodetool upgradesstables. Since this command might take time to finish,
I wonder if this step could be skip? if I do not upgrade the sstables what
is going to happen?

Thanks
Boris

--0016e6dd98969085be04c01dcdad
Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Hi,<div><br></div><div>Our cluster is currently running on 0.8.10, we plan =
on upgrading it to 1.0.x. We read the document from the datastax website, t=
he final step is to use nodetool upgradesstables. Since this command might =
take time to finish, I wonder if this step could be skip? if I do not upgra=
de the sstables what is going to happen?</div>
<div><br></div><div>Thanks</div><div>Boris</div>

--0016e6dd98969085be04c01dcdad--