Hi Tyler and Aaron,
Thanks for your replies.
fetching scs using your pycassa script on our server takes ~7 s - consistent with the times we've been seeing. Now, we aren't really experts in Cassandra, but it seems that JNA is enabled by default for Cassandra > 1.0 according to Jeremy (http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.comp.db.cassandra.user/21441). But in case it isn't, how do you turn it on in 1.0.8?
I'm also setting MAX_HEAP_SIZE="2G" in cassandra-env.sh. I'm hoping that's how you increase java heap size. I've tried "3G" as well, without any increase in performance. It did however allow for taking larger slices.
we are not doing multi-threaded requests for now, but we'll give it a shot in the next day or two and I'll let you know if there is any improvement
Thanks for your help!
I tested this out with a small pycassa script: https://gist.github.com/2418598
On my not-very-impressive laptop, I can read 5000 of the super columns in 3 seconds (cold) or 1.5 (warm). Reading in batches of 1000 super columns at a time gives much better performance; I definitely recommend going with a smaller batch size.
Make sure that the timeout on your ConnectionPool isn't too low to handle a big request in pycassa. If you turn on logging (as it is in the script I linked), you should be able to see if the request is timing out a couple of times before it succeeds.
It might also be good to make sure that you've got JNA in place and your heap size is sufficient.--On Wed, Apr 18, 2012 at 8:59 PM, Aaron Turner <firstname.lastname@example.org> wrote:
Is your client mult-threaded? The single threaded performance ofOn Wed, Apr 18, 2012 at 5:00 PM, Dan Feldman <email@example.com> wrote:
> Hi all,
> I'm trying to optimize moving data from Cassandra to HDFS using either Ruby
> or Python client. Right now, I'm playing around on my staging server, an 8
> GB single node machine. My data in Cassandra (1.0.8) consist of 2 rows (for
> now) with ~150k super columns each (I know, I know - super columns are bad).
> Every super column has ~25 columns totaling ~800 bytes per super column.
> I should also mention that currently the database is static - there are no
> writes/updates, only reads.
> Anyways, in my python/ruby scripts, I'm taking slices of 5000 supercolumns
> long from a single row. It takes 13 seconds with ruby and 8 seconds with
> pycassa to get a single slice. Or, in other words, it's currently reading at
> speeds of less than 500 kB per second. The speed seems to be linear with the
> length of a slice (i.e. 6 seconds for 2500 scs for ruby). If I run nodetool
> cfstats while my script is running, it tells me that my read latency on the
> column family is ~300ms.
> I assume that this is not normal and thus was wondering what parameters I
> could tweak to improve the performance.
Cassandra isn't at all impressive and it really is designed for
dealing with a lot of simultaneous requests.
http://synfin.net/ Twitter: @synfinatic
http://tcpreplay.synfin.net/ - Pcap editing and replay tools for Unix & Windows
Those who would give up essential Liberty, to purchase a little temporary
Safety, deserve neither Liberty nor Safety.
-- Benjamin Franklin
"carpe diem quam minimum credula postero"