Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-cassandra-user-archive@www.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-cassandra-user-archive@www.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 25D969647 for ; Tue, 28 Feb 2012 09:50:59 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 52400 invoked by uid 500); 28 Feb 2012 09:50:56 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-cassandra-user-archive@cassandra.apache.org Received: (qmail 52381 invoked by uid 500); 28 Feb 2012 09:50:56 -0000 Mailing-List: contact user-help@cassandra.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: user@cassandra.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list user@cassandra.apache.org Received: (qmail 52373 invoked by uid 99); 28 Feb 2012 09:50:56 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 28 Feb 2012 09:50:56 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=5.0 tests=SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [94.75.197.170] (HELO mail.unitedgames.com) (94.75.197.170) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 28 Feb 2012 09:50:49 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail.unitedgames.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BBFB32D248 for ; Tue, 28 Feb 2012 10:50:28 +0100 (CET) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=unitedgames.com; h=content-transfer-encoding:content-type:content-type:subject :subject:to:mime-version:user-agent:from:from:date:date :message-id; s=dkim; t=1330422628; x=1331286628; bh=ZKBudhrpL6kV SxrexRuZTLLyW3Y5FbrUNrU9lGGg2ZY=; b=oONzgkaW56XasH+EfaLTjc7RflSp vCk8yVaJIMLrRod4xsz3SIRJv3q15WgEgfnugzlS1yK5J01nXDa3kQu7zSgPFsz5 J2QutzvERzZv/3MUs7w/endIOJFfloNlkgLGzYKd1T73601FkUlkNkEMfVT7iYRL sDwEw5UUEjTAbOk= X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at mail.unitedgames.com Received: from mail.unitedgames.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (mail.unitedgames.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id AtZyZOBVC71C for ; Tue, 28 Feb 2012 10:50:28 +0100 (CET) Received: from [192.168.1.75] (unknown [188.204.191.147]) by mail.unitedgames.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 3DF262D247 for ; Tue, 28 Feb 2012 10:50:28 +0100 (CET) Message-ID: <4F4CA35F.3040807@unitedgames.com> Date: Tue, 28 Feb 2012 10:50:23 +0100 From: Stefan Reek User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; en-US; rv:1.9.1.16) Gecko/20110307 Iceowl/1.0b1 Icedove/3.0.11 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: user@cassandra.apache.org Subject: Impact of old data on performance Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Hi All, We are running a 3-node cluster with Cassandra 0.6.13. We are in the process of upgrading to 1.x, but can't do so for a while because we can't take the cluster offline. Until now 0.6.13 has run without problems, but lately we are getting some performance issues. We are getting timeouts on both reads and writes. The cluster contains a lot of "old" data which is only read very occasionally and not written to at all. Is it possible for this data to negatively impact the performance of the cluster? If so, would it help to move this data to another columnfamily/keyspace? Cheers, Stefan