+1 on coprocessors!!!!
On Mon, Nov 14, 2011 at 4:44 PM, Jake Luciani <email@example.com> wrote:Does it cause any impact on reads and writes while re-balance is in
> Re Simpler "elasticity":
> Latest opscenter will now rebalance cluster optimally
progress? How is it handled on live cluster?
> On Mon, Nov 14, 2011 at 7:27 PM, Chris Burroughs <firstname.lastname@example.org>
>> - It would be super cool if all of that counter work made it possible
>> to support other atomic data types (sets? CAS? just pass a assoc/commun
>> Function to apply).
>> - Again with types, pluggable type specific compression.
>> - Wishy washy wish: Simpler "elasticity" I would like to go from
>> 6-->8-->7 nodes without each of those being an annoying fight with tokens.
>> - Gossip as library. Gossip/failure detection is something C* seems to
>> have gotten particularly right (or at least it's something that has not
>> needed to change much). It would be cool to use Cassandra's gossip
>> protocol as distributed systems building tool a la ZooKeeper.
>> On 11/01/2011 06:59 PM, Jonathan Ellis wrote:
>> > Hi all,
>> > Two years ago I asked for Cassandra use cases and feature requests.
>> >  The results  have been extremely useful in setting and
>> > prioritizing goals for Cassandra development. But with the release of
>> > 1.0 we've accomplished basically everything from our original wish
>> > list. 
>> > I'd love to hear from modern Cassandra users again, especially if
>> > you're usually a quiet lurker. What does Cassandra do well? What are
>> > your pain points? What's your feature wish list?
>> > As before, if you're in stealth mode or don't want to say anything in
>> > public, feel free to reply to me privately and I will keep it off the
>> > record.
>> > 
>> > http://email@example.com/msg01148.html
>> > 
>> > http://firstname.lastname@example.org/msg01446.html
>> >  http://email@example.com/msg01524.html