Return-Path: 
 <user-return-21440-apmail-cassandra-user-archive=cassandra.apache.org@cassandra.apache.org>
X-Original-To: apmail-cassandra-user-archive@www.apache.org
Delivered-To: apmail-cassandra-user-archive@www.apache.org
Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3])
	by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 6890C95A6
	for <apmail-cassandra-user-archive@www.apache.org>;
 Fri,  7 Oct 2011 18:03:08 +0000 (UTC)
Received: (qmail 76676 invoked by uid 500); 7 Oct 2011 18:03:04 -0000
Delivered-To: apmail-cassandra-user-archive@cassandra.apache.org
Received: (qmail 76657 invoked by uid 500); 7 Oct 2011 18:03:04 -0000
Mailing-List: contact user-help@cassandra.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:user-help@cassandra.apache.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:user-unsubscribe@cassandra.apache.org>
List-Post: <mailto:user@cassandra.apache.org>
List-Id: <user.cassandra.apache.org>
Reply-To: user@cassandra.apache.org
Delivered-To: mailing list user@cassandra.apache.org
Received: (qmail 76649 invoked by uid 99); 7 Oct 2011 18:03:04 -0000
Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230)
    by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 07 Oct 2011 18:03:04 +0000
X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.1 required=5.0
	tests=HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED,SPF_PASS
X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org
Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of amartens@ngmoco.com designates
 74.125.149.199 as permitted sender)
Received: from [74.125.149.199] (HELO na3sys009aog108.obsmtp.com)
 (74.125.149.199)
    by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with SMTP; Fri, 07 Oct 2011 18:02:55 +0000
Received: from mail-vw0-f50.google.com ([209.85.212.50]) (using TLSv1) by
 na3sys009aob108.postini.com ([74.125.148.12]) with SMTP;
	Fri, 07 Oct 2011 11:02:34 PDT
Received: by mail-vw0-f50.google.com with SMTP id 9so4109253vws.37
        for <user@cassandra.apache.org>; Fri, 07 Oct 2011 11:02:32 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.52.173.115 with SMTP id bj19mr3813992vdc.43.1318010552434;
 Fri, 07 Oct 2011 11:02:32 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.52.181.99 with HTTP; Fri, 7 Oct 2011 11:02:32 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <A99A3991-D91A-4265-89DD-DAC91201DA87@thelastpickle.com>
References: 
 <CABpESiJtXahykwOObV0Zkeaa0gugG58DK2VtTN0yh5yBn2HaLA@mail.gmail.com>
	<CALdd-zgs2v447nM5mkZ51XdY9vffrLQ6F7sOfoYQF+yNBduAcQ@mail.gmail.com>
	<CABpESiJy7FDOBkMcAHsdRMvWPM63L8qvdayEtOeAE-7s1E6WKw@mail.gmail.com>
	<CABpESiJiUKF73W85KejNPtiVOhLWBU=nR8B6obTfDfdTgN-OHQ@mail.gmail.com>
	<A99A3991-D91A-4265-89DD-DAC91201DA87@thelastpickle.com>
Date: Fri, 7 Oct 2011 11:02:32 -0700
Message-ID: 
 <CABpESiJA2xS+M-cssx+uH_6iNtr9RL=uP3HMJby0YJdMhXgBXg@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: 0.7.9 RejectedExecutionException
From: Ashley Martens <amartens@ngmoco.com>
To: user@cassandra.apache.org
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=bcaec51b15b7c9c0a804aeb93e3c
X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org

--bcaec51b15b7c9c0a804aeb93e3c
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1

Okay, this is still a problem. This node keeps dieing at 1am every day, most
times without an error in the log. I'd appriciate any help in tracking down
why.

Additionally, I don't understand why 0.7.x using *way* more RAM than 0.6.x
and 0.8.x, from a top or ps perspective. I'm now watching the JVM memory and
it seems to be more in line with 0.6.x but the MAX heap is crazy high (28G
on my servers).

--bcaec51b15b7c9c0a804aeb93e3c
Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Okay, this is still a problem. This node keeps dieing at 1am every day, mos=
t times without an error in the log. I&#39;d appriciate any help in trackin=
g down why.<br><br>Additionally, I don&#39;t understand why 0.7.x using *wa=
y* more RAM than 0.6.x and 0.8.x, from a top or ps perspective. I&#39;m now=
 watching the JVM memory and it seems to be more in line with 0.6.x but the=
 MAX heap is crazy high (28G on my servers).<br>


--bcaec51b15b7c9c0a804aeb93e3c--