cassandra-user mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Watanabe Maki <watanabe.m...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: Meaning of 'nodetool repair has to run within GCGraceSeconds'
Date Fri, 01 Jul 2011 00:51:41 GMT
Repair doesn't compact. Those are different processes already.

maki


On 2011/07/01, at 7:21, A J <s5alye@gmail.com> wrote:

> Thanks all !
> In other words, I think it is safe to say that a node as a whole can
> be made consistent only on 'nodetool repair'.
> 
> Has there been enough interest in providing anti-entropy without
> compaction as a separate operation (nodetool repair does both) ?
> 
> 
> On Thu, Jun 30, 2011 at 5:27 PM, Jonathan Ellis <jbellis@gmail.com> wrote:
>> On Thu, Jun 30, 2011 at 3:47 PM, Edward Capriolo <edlinuxguru@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> Read repair does NOT repair tombstones.
>> 
>> It does, but you can't rely on RR to repair _all_ tombstones, because
>> RR only happens if the row in question is requested by a client.
>> 
>> --
>> Jonathan Ellis
>> Project Chair, Apache Cassandra
>> co-founder of DataStax, the source for professional Cassandra support
>> http://www.datastax.com
>> 

Mime
View raw message