Mailing-List: contact user-help@cassandra.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: user@cassandra.apache.org
Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of sdolgy@gmail.com designates
 209.85.212.44 as permitted sender)
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws;
        d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
        h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to
         :content-type:content-transfer-encoding;
        b=IfUIPnmUEV3fp2xbdOg6jSj622jZBrntF+SkNUacadp3a6e8CPRjPzjrTtFuzuNoHr
         CfaP89odkqIueu7/V3uAjvB/e4vxtRT6/UUDV0IzNz0hKFvCOmxVYm8M8osRympHowfz
         hqSlt1MD1VbsvtD0QeUyLji0tF6QhIpegCSaE=
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <4E026F65.5040400@gmail.com>
References: <BANLkTimX6a2WFsU-OTpFwnvSu5KiXrYuaA@mail.gmail.com>
 <BANLkTi=xWEPj+v98ouv7v+WxEGK3uR6aFQ@mail.gmail.com>
 <BANLkTim+RXfFrajR2cwsU_6yS3xdfbRxkQ@mail.gmail.com>
 <BANLkTim2oJcT+Sp0iEhmU-SgD7sZgktRPg@mail.gmail.com>
 <4E02682F.3000100@gmail.com>
 <BANLkTikn1be6VqUyyggeoSZRLDZ=cfVBrg@mail.gmail.com>
 <4E026F65.5040400@gmail.com>
From: Sasha Dolgy <sdolgy@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 23 Jun 2011 00:43:29 +0200
Message-ID: <BANLkTim9pNHmkexNmcFc15vEj6pKtKXVqA@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: OOM (or, what settings to use on AWS large?)
To: user@cassandra.apache.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

yes.  each one corresponds with taking a node down for various
reasons.  i think more people should show their graphs.  it's great.
hoping Oberman has some.....so we can see what his look like ,,

On Thu, Jun 23, 2011 at 12:40 AM, Chris Burroughs
<chris.burroughs@gmail.com> wrote:
> Do all of the reductions in Used on that graph correspond to node restart=
s?
>
> My Zabbix for reference: http://img194.imageshack.us/img194/383/2weekmem.=
png
>
>
> On 06/22/2011 06:35 PM, Sasha Dolgy wrote:
>> http://www.twitpic.com/5fdabn
>> http://www.twitpic.com/5fdbdg
>>
>> i do love a good graph. =A0two of the weekly memory utilization graphs
>> for 2 of the 4 servers from this ring... week 21 was a nice week ...
>> the week before 0.8.0 went out proper. =A0since then, bumped up to 0.8
>> and have seen a steady increase in the memory consumption (used) but
>> have not seen the swap do what it did ...and the buffered/cached seems
>> much better
>>
>> -sd
>>
>> On Thu, Jun 23, 2011 at 12:09 AM, Chris Burroughs
>> <chris.burroughs@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>> In `free` terms, by pegged do you mean that free "Mem" was 0, or "-/+
>>> buffers/cache" as 0?
>
>


--=20
Sasha Dolgy
sasha.dolgy@gmail.com