cassandra-user mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Jeffrey Kesselman <jef...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: nosql yes but yescql, no?
Date Wed, 08 Jun 2011 19:09:12 GMT
That makes sense :)

On Wed, Jun 8, 2011 at 2:37 PM, Jeremy Hanna <jeremy.hanna1234@gmail.com> wrote:
> I think that's partly the idea of it.  CQL could end up being a way forward and it currently
builds on thrift.  Then if it becomes the API/client of record to build on, then it could
move to something else underneath that's more efficient and CQL itself wouldn't have to change
at all.
>
> On Jun 8, 2011, at 1:29 PM, Jeffrey Kesselman wrote:
>
>> While I agree the Thrift API sucks, Id love to see that sovled on a
>> binary level, and CQl on top of that.
>>
>> JK
>>
>> On Wed, Jun 8, 2011 at 2:50 PM, Marcos Ortiz <mlortiz@uci.cu> wrote:
>>> On 06/08/2011 01:23 PM, SriSatish Ambati wrote:
>>>
>>> Gotta love, Eric!
>>> http://www.slideshare.net/jericevans/nosql-yes-but-yescql-no
>>>
>>> --
>>> SriSatish Ambati
>>> Director of Engineering, DataStax
>>> @srisatish
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Good resource.
>>> Thanks for share it with us SriSatish
>>>
>>> Regards
>>>
>>> --
>>> Marcos Luís Ortíz Valmaseda
>>> Software Engineer (UCI)
>>> http://marcosluis2186.posterous.com
>>> http://twitter.com/marcosluis2186
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> It's always darkest just before you are eaten by a grue.
>
>



-- 
It's always darkest just before you are eaten by a grue.

Mime
View raw message