cassandra-user mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Yang <teddyyyy...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: Propose new ConsistencyLevel.ALL_AVAIL for reads
Date Thu, 16 Jun 2011 17:10:08 GMT
consistency level definition should be a definition of requirement from the
application perspective,
it should not be tied to some ephemeral state in the system (: a node being
deemed "available/up" or down is determined by
the gossip and changes every second )


what you want can be simply achieved by CL=ALL and then modifying current
read result to not return failure, but return the "best effort" result
obtained so far
--- although that will need you to wait for a slightly longer time




On Thu, Jun 16, 2011 at 9:46 AM, AJ <aj@dude.podzone.net> wrote:

> On 6/16/2011 10:05 AM, Ryan King wrote:
>
>>
>> I don't think this buys you anything that you can't get with quorum
>> reads and writes.
>>
>> -ryan
>>
>>
> QUORUM <= ALL_AVAIL <= ALL == RF
>

Mime
View raw message