Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-cassandra-user-archive@www.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-cassandra-user-archive@www.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 7DA4220EB for ; Sat, 23 Apr 2011 08:16:29 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 50642 invoked by uid 500); 23 Apr 2011 08:16:26 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-cassandra-user-archive@cassandra.apache.org Received: (qmail 50595 invoked by uid 500); 23 Apr 2011 08:16:26 -0000 Mailing-List: contact user-help@cassandra.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: user@cassandra.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list user@cassandra.apache.org Received: (qmail 50587 invoked by uid 99); 23 Apr 2011 08:16:26 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 23 Apr 2011 08:16:26 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.7 required=5.0 tests=FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,RFC_ABUSE_POST,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of watanabe.maki@gmail.com designates 209.85.214.44 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.214.44] (HELO mail-bw0-f44.google.com) (209.85.214.44) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 23 Apr 2011 08:16:21 +0000 Received: by bwz13 with SMTP id 13so925020bwz.31 for ; Sat, 23 Apr 2011 01:15:59 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=TncyuJVsAU+GxXB29VzzxlpA7Iv25byIheYPsjpD/aE=; b=XSEjGfLN8qqM+y4lZj50rEhHnPBHK340xoatmuFsPgbneQrZft+yQgd7SFprvRZI/x 1F5AYWnhC9X5pbeerOB0a1FIf34gz3KzoFtS3ngVpdBjRD8sgD7n11uarawxpwaX5s7V q7yeuldEwzdmKuDVUpl5fQHk/9ljAagroLbKg= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; b=pUykNQjl3SZBm5lRWvFu0nH6h7CEBgjC1gGW2/khs49mPpuxA1/sdzQAmzIgMtffLX TzkoGnq778T9x/WG2LMFd9ttOtqbPlwBCu7c8exCU8KwJLB6UtHteYpvOT6gzdgXgmZg tWcawMlxsWyCDuolq4WaPq0C/Sswzzqf2WXJM= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.204.136.210 with SMTP id s18mr1497634bkt.56.1303546559779; Sat, 23 Apr 2011 01:15:59 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.204.114.18 with HTTP; Sat, 23 Apr 2011 01:15:59 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <4DB22901.6050301@fuzzy.cz> References: <4DB21620.2070105@fuzzy.cz> <4DB22901.6050301@fuzzy.cz> Date: Sat, 23 Apr 2011 17:15:59 +0900 Message-ID: Subject: Re: multiple nodes sharing the same IP From: Maki Watanabe To: user@cassandra.apache.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 storage_port: Used for Gossip and Data exchange. So in your word, it is the port for the seeds. You CAN change the storage_port, but all nodes in your ring need to use same storage_port number. That's why you need different IP address for each node. rpc_port: Used for Thrift which the Cassandra clients connect to. I can't understand why you can't change rpc_port. maki 2011/4/23 Tomas Vondra : > Dne 23.4.2011 03:08, Jonathan Ellis napsal(a): >> You really need different IPs. > > OK, thanks. Is there some reason for that? Because if you can't specify > the port for the seeds (which seems like the reason why different IPs > are needed), then you actually can't change the port at all. So the rpc > port is actually fixed and there's no point in changing it ... > > Tomas >