Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-cassandra-user-archive@www.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-cassandra-user-archive@www.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 988A536FD for ; Sat, 30 Apr 2011 02:35:31 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 8181 invoked by uid 500); 30 Apr 2011 02:35:29 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-cassandra-user-archive@cassandra.apache.org Received: (qmail 8077 invoked by uid 500); 30 Apr 2011 02:35:29 -0000 Mailing-List: contact user-help@cassandra.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: user@cassandra.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list user@cassandra.apache.org Received: (qmail 8069 invoked by uid 99); 30 Apr 2011 02:35:28 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 30 Apr 2011 02:35:28 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.2 required=5.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (athena.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [209.85.161.44] (HELO mail-fx0-f44.google.com) (209.85.161.44) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 30 Apr 2011 02:35:24 +0000 Received: by fxm15 with SMTP id 15so3275417fxm.31 for ; Fri, 29 Apr 2011 19:35:00 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.223.58.80 with SMTP id f16mr484889fah.148.1304130900449; Fri, 29 Apr 2011 19:35:00 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.223.74.199 with HTTP; Fri, 29 Apr 2011 19:35:00 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <1304126324.7843.2.camel@erebus.lan> References: <1304126324.7843.2.camel@erebus.lan> Date: Sat, 30 Apr 2011 12:35:00 +1000 Message-ID: Subject: Re: 0.7.5 Debian packages - can't upgrade? From: Dan Washusen To: user@cassandra.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=0015173fe7ec0fd8e304a219a31d --0015173fe7ec0fd8e304a219a31d Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Thanks for the response. :) I should have also mentioned that I'm running this on Ubuntu Karmic Koala(9.10). The output of `sudo aptitude full-upgrade` looks the same as safe-upgrade: > Reading package lists... Done > Building dependency tree > Reading state information... Done > Reading extended state information > Initializing package states... Done > No packages will be installed, upgraded, or removed. > 0 packages upgraded, 0 newly installed, 0 to remove and 1 not upgraded. > Need to get 0B of archives. After unpacking 0B will be used. > Reading package lists... Done > Building dependency tree > Reading state information... Done > Reading extended state information > Initializing package states... Done Here is the output of 'apt-cache policy && apt-cache policy cassandra': http://pastebin.com/PqRiGmWi On 30 April 2011 11:18, Eric Evans wrote: > On Sat, 2011-04-30 at 09:34 +1000, Dan Washusen wrote: > > > sudo aptitude update > > > > sudo aptitude safe-upgrade > > > > > > The upgrade shows this: > > > > > Reading package lists... Done > > > Building dependency tree > > > Reading state information... Done > > > Reading extended state information > > > Initializing package states... Done > > > No packages will be installed, upgraded, or removed. > > > 0 packages upgraded, 0 newly installed, 0 to remove and *1 not > > upgraded*. > > > Need to get 0B of archives. After unpacking 0B will be used. > > > Reading package lists... Done > > > Building dependency tree > > > Reading state information... Done > > > Reading extended state information > > > Initializing package states... Done > > > > > > The above mentions that 1 package wasn't upgraded (I assume this is > > 0.7.5). > > Anyone have any ideas what I'm doing wrong? > > Usually this means that upgrading would install a new package (i.e. that > it picked up a new dependency), which shouldn't be the case. You might > try an `aptitude full-upgrade' just to see what that might be. You > could also try pasting the output of `apt-cache policy && apt-cache > policy cassandra' to the list. > > -- > Eric Evans > eevans@rackspace.com > > --0015173fe7ec0fd8e304a219a31d Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Thanks for the response. :)

I should have also mention= ed that I'm running this on Ubuntu Karmic Koala (9.10).

The output = of `sudo aptitude full-upgrade` looks the same as safe-upgrade:
Reading package lists... Done
Building dependency tree =A0 =A0 =A0=A0Reading state information... Done
Reading extended state information = =A0 =A0 =A0
Initializing package states... Done
No packages will be i= nstalled, upgraded, or removed.
0 packages upgraded, 0 newly installed, 0 to remove and 1 not upgraded.
= Need to get 0B of archives. After unpacking 0B will be used.
Reading pac= kage lists... Done
Building dependency tree =A0 =A0 =A0=A0
Reading st= ate information... Done
Reading extended state information =A0 =A0 =A0
Initializing package stat= es... Done

Here is the output of 'apt-cache policy && ap= t-cache policy cassandra':=A0
http://= pastebin.com/PqRiGmWi


On 30 April 2011 1= 1:18, Eric Evans <eevans@rackspace.com> wrote:
On Sat, 2011-04-30 at 09:= 34 +1000, Dan Washusen wrote:
> > sudo aptitude update
>
> sudo aptitude safe-upgrade
>
>
> The upgrade shows this:
>
> > Reading package lists... Done
> > Building dependency tree
> > Reading state information... Done
> > Reading extended state information
> > Initializing package states... Done
> > No packages will be installed, upgraded, or removed.
> > 0 packages upgraded, 0 newly installed, 0 to remove and *1 not > upgraded*.
> > Need to get 0B of archives. After unpacking 0B will be used.
> > Reading package lists... Done
> > Building dependency tree
> > Reading state information... Done
> > Reading extended state information
> > Initializing package states... Done
>
>
> The above mentions that 1 package wasn't upgraded (I assume this i= s
> 0.7.5).
> =A0Anyone have any ideas what I'm doing wrong?

Usually this means that upgrading would install a new package (i.e. t= hat
it picked up a new dependency), which shouldn't be the case. =A0You mig= ht
try an `aptitude full-upgrade' just to see what that might be. =A0You could also try pasting the output of `apt-cache policy && apt-cache=
policy cassandra' to the list.

--
Eric Evans
eevans@rackspace.com


--0015173fe7ec0fd8e304a219a31d--