cassandra-user mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Dan Washusen <...@reactive.org>
Subject Re: 0.7.5 Debian packages - can't upgrade?
Date Sat, 30 Apr 2011 02:35:00 GMT
Thanks for the response. :)

I should have also mentioned that I'm running this on Ubuntu Karmic
Koala<http://i44.tinypic.com/27xp2lc.jpg>(9.10).

The output of `sudo aptitude full-upgrade` looks the same as safe-upgrade:

> Reading package lists... Done
> Building dependency tree
> Reading state information... Done
> Reading extended state information
> Initializing package states... Done
> No packages will be installed, upgraded, or removed.
> 0 packages upgraded, 0 newly installed, 0 to remove and 1 not upgraded.
> Need to get 0B of archives. After unpacking 0B will be used.
> Reading package lists... Done
> Building dependency tree
> Reading state information... Done
> Reading extended state information
> Initializing package states... Done


Here is the output of 'apt-cache policy && apt-cache policy cassandra':
http://pastebin.com/PqRiGmWi


On 30 April 2011 11:18, Eric Evans <eevans@rackspace.com> wrote:

> On Sat, 2011-04-30 at 09:34 +1000, Dan Washusen wrote:
> > > sudo aptitude update
> >
> > sudo aptitude safe-upgrade
> >
> >
> > The upgrade shows this:
> >
> > > Reading package lists... Done
> > > Building dependency tree
> > > Reading state information... Done
> > > Reading extended state information
> > > Initializing package states... Done
> > > No packages will be installed, upgraded, or removed.
> > > 0 packages upgraded, 0 newly installed, 0 to remove and *1 not
> > upgraded*.
> > > Need to get 0B of archives. After unpacking 0B will be used.
> > > Reading package lists... Done
> > > Building dependency tree
> > > Reading state information... Done
> > > Reading extended state information
> > > Initializing package states... Done
> >
> >
> > The above mentions that 1 package wasn't upgraded (I assume this is
> > 0.7.5).
> >  Anyone have any ideas what I'm doing wrong?
>
> Usually this means that upgrading would install a new package (i.e. that
> it picked up a new dependency), which shouldn't be the case.  You might
> try an `aptitude full-upgrade' just to see what that might be.  You
> could also try pasting the output of `apt-cache policy && apt-cache
> policy cassandra' to the list.
>
> --
> Eric Evans
> eevans@rackspace.com
>
>

Mime
View raw message