cassandra-user mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Jeremiah Jordan" <JEREMIAH.JOR...@morningstar.com>
Subject RE: Ditching Cassandra
Date Fri, 01 Apr 2011 14:52:33 GMT
Quick comment on libraries for different languages.
The libraries for different languages should almost ALWAYS look
different.  They should look like what someone using that language
expects an API to look like.  If someone gave me a python API that used
java's builder pattern instead of named keyword arguments I would have
to shoot myself.

-Jeremiah

________________________________

From: Gregori Schmidt [mailto:grokdata@gmail.com] 
Sent: Wednesday, March 30, 2011 6:04 PM
To: user@cassandra.apache.org
Subject: Re: Ditching Cassandra


On Wed, Mar 30, 2011 at 3:15 AM, Eric Evans <eevans@rackspace.com>
wrote:


	The client space as a whole *is* a mess, despite heroic efforts
on the
	part of our third-party API maintainers, but forcing them
in-tree is not
	going to solve anything.  In fact, it would very likely make it
worse by
	adding unnecessary overhead to contribution, and discouraging
	innovation.
	


I can understand your reluctance to do the clients "in-tree" since it
will be a lot of work and people will no doubt be upset if their client
is not chosen for a given language.  But I think this is the wrong
approach for three reasons.


First, the client libraries in different languages should look alike.
Having libraries that look different in different languages is a very
bad idea indeed.          

Mime
View raw message