Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-cassandra-user-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 89230 invoked from network); 17 Mar 2011 17:07:14 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 17 Mar 2011 17:07:14 -0000 Received: (qmail 46013 invoked by uid 500); 17 Mar 2011 17:07:11 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-cassandra-user-archive@cassandra.apache.org Received: (qmail 45982 invoked by uid 500); 17 Mar 2011 17:07:11 -0000 Mailing-List: contact user-help@cassandra.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: user@cassandra.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list user@cassandra.apache.org Received: (qmail 45974 invoked by uid 99); 17 Mar 2011 17:07:11 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 17 Mar 2011 17:07:11 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.2 required=5.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (athena.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [209.85.212.44] (HELO mail-vw0-f44.google.com) (209.85.212.44) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 17 Mar 2011 17:07:05 +0000 Received: by vws12 with SMTP id 12so3373808vws.31 for ; Thu, 17 Mar 2011 10:06:44 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.52.0.196 with SMTP id 4mr2083473vdg.215.1300381603865; Thu, 17 Mar 2011 10:06:43 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail-vx0-f172.google.com ([209.85.220.172]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id 13sm711070vdc.28.2011.03.17.10.06.43 (version=SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Thu, 17 Mar 2011 10:06:43 -0700 (PDT) Received: by vxg33 with SMTP id 33so3288149vxg.31 for ; Thu, 17 Mar 2011 10:06:43 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.52.90.171 with SMTP id bx11mr36996vdb.36.1300381570428; Thu, 17 Mar 2011 10:06:10 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.220.178.138 with HTTP; Thu, 17 Mar 2011 10:06:10 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <4D823D9E.5040400@yellowseo.com> References: <4D80FDBC.1010601@yellowseo.com> <4D81113A.4090804@yellowseo.com> <4D823D9E.5040400@yellowseo.com> Date: Thu, 17 Mar 2011 18:06:10 +0100 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Upgrade to a different version? From: Thibaut Britz To: user@cassandra.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=20cf3071c97c93f169049eb0ad2a --20cf3071c97c93f169049eb0ad2a Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 If it helps you to sleep better, we use cassandra (0.7.2 with the flush fix) in production on > 100 servers. Thibaut On Thu, Mar 17, 2011 at 5:58 PM, Paul Pak wrote: > I'm at a crossroads right now. We built an application around .7 and > the features in .7, so going back to .6 wasn't an option for us. Now, > we are in the middle of setting up dual mysql and cassandra support so > that we can "fallback" to mysql if Cassandra can't handle the workload > properly. It's a stupid amount of extra work, but I think it's > unavoidable for us given the state of things with .7. It also gives us > the benefit of seeing the true benefit of Cassandra over mysql in our > particular application and make a decision from there. > > Paul > > On 3/16/2011 9:03 PM, Joshua Partogi wrote: > > So did you downgraded it back to 0.6.x series? > > > > --20cf3071c97c93f169049eb0ad2a Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable If it helps you to sleep better,

we use cassandra=A0 (0.7.2 with the= flush fix) in production on > 100 servers.

Thibaut

On Thu, Mar 17, 2011 at 5:58 PM, Paul Pak <ppak@yellowseo.com><= /span> wrote:
I'm at a cros= sroads right now. =A0We built an application around .7 and
the features in .7, so going back to .6 wasn't an option for us. =A0Now= ,
we are in the middle of setting up dual mysql and cassandra support so
that we can "fallback" to mysql if Cassandra can't handle the= workload
properly. =A0It's a stupid amount of extra work, but I think it's unavoidable for us given the state of things with .7. =A0It also gives us the benefit of seeing the true benefit of Cassandra over mysql in our
particular application and make a decision from there.

Paul

On 3/16/2011 9:03 PM, Joshua Partogi wrote:
> So did you downgraded it back to 0.6.x series?
>


--20cf3071c97c93f169049eb0ad2a--