Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-cassandra-user-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 30551 invoked from network); 2 Feb 2011 15:36:03 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 2 Feb 2011 15:36:03 -0000 Received: (qmail 1792 invoked by uid 500); 2 Feb 2011 15:36:01 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-cassandra-user-archive@cassandra.apache.org Received: (qmail 1589 invoked by uid 500); 2 Feb 2011 15:35:58 -0000 Mailing-List: contact user-help@cassandra.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: user@cassandra.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list user@cassandra.apache.org Received: (qmail 1577 invoked by uid 500); 2 Feb 2011 15:35:57 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-cassandra-user@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 1574 invoked by uid 99); 2 Feb 2011 15:35:57 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 02 Feb 2011 15:35:57 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.0 required=5.0 tests=SPF_NEUTRAL,URI_HEX X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (athena.apache.org: 216.139.236.26 is neither permitted nor denied by domain of potekhin@bnl.gov) Received: from [216.139.236.26] (HELO sam.nabble.com) (216.139.236.26) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 02 Feb 2011 15:35:52 +0000 Received: from jim.nabble.com ([192.168.236.80]) by sam.nabble.com with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Pkejz-0000uI-MV for cassandra-user@incubator.apache.org; Wed, 02 Feb 2011 07:35:31 -0800 Date: Wed, 2 Feb 2011 07:35:31 -0800 (PST) From: buddhasystem To: cassandra-user@incubator.apache.org Message-ID: <1296660931172-5985214.post@n2.nabble.com> Subject: Counters in 0.8 -- conditional? MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit I'm looking at http://wiki.apache.org/cassandra/Counters So, the counter feature -- it doesn't seem to count rows based in criteria, such as index condition. Is that correct? Case in point, I keep a large inventory of computational tasks over a long period of time. I'm supposed to report on fairly random periods of time, what were the failure counts and other status condition on exit. So noting except for an aggregate function will work (unless I do a scan which is clearly unmanageable). TIA. -- View this message in context: http://cassandra-user-incubator-apache-org.3065146.n2.nabble.com/Counters-in-0-8-conditional-tp5985214p5985214.html Sent from the cassandra-user@incubator.apache.org mailing list archive at Nabble.com.