cassandra-user mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Aaron Morton <aa...@thelastpickle.com>
Subject Re: What is the most solid version of Cassandra? No secondary indexes needed.
Date Wed, 16 Feb 2011 19:31:21 GMT
0.7.2 is just about to be released.

Aaron

On 16/02/2011, at 11:42 AM, buddhasystem <potekhin@bnl.gov> wrote:

> 
> Thank you Attila!
> 
> We will indeed have a few months of "breaking in". I suppose I'll
> keep my fingers crossed and see that 0.7.X is very stable. So I'll
> deploy 0.7.1 -- I will need to apply all the patches, there is no
> cumulative download, is that correct?
> 
> 
> Attila Babo wrote:
>> 
>> 0.6.8 is stable and production ready, the later versions of the 0.6
>> branch has "issues". No offense, but the 0.7 branch is fairly unstable
>> from my experience. I have reproduced all the open bugs with a
>> production dataset, even when tried to rebuild it from scratch after a
>> complete loss.
>> 
>> If you have a few month before going to production your best bet is
>> still 0.7.1 as it will stabilize but the switch between versions is
>> painful.
>> 
>> /Attila
>> 
>> 
> 
> -- 
> View this message in context: http://cassandra-user-incubator-apache-org.3065146.n2.nabble.com/What-is-the-most-solid-version-of-Cassandra-No-secondary-indexes-needed-tp6028966p6029622.html
> Sent from the cassandra-user@incubator.apache.org mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

Mime
View raw message