JNA is disabled and it is a windows box.
Ivan
On 19.2.2011 г. 19:23 ч., Jake Luciani wrote:
> Are you running with JNA enabled? If so could you try disabling it?
>
> On Sat, Feb 19, 2011 at 11:32 AM, Ivan Georgiev <yngwiie@bk.ru
> <mailto:yngwiie@bk.ru>> wrote:
>
> On 19.2.2011 г. 16:43 ч., Jonathan Ellis wrote:
>
> Flush code didn't change between 0.7.0 and 0.7.2. There must
> be some
> other variable here. Memory pressure maybe?
>
>
> Cloud you please elaborate on that one ?
> The conditions are exactly the same for the test with 0.7.0 and 0.7.2.
> By the way, 0.7.1 tests are similar to 0.7.2, while 0.7 early
> betas to 0.7.0 is fine.
>
> Ivan
>
>
> On 19.2.2011 г. 16:43 ч., Jonathan Ellis wrote:
>
> Flush code didn't change between 0.7.0 and 0.7.2. There must
> be some
> other variable here. Memory pressure maybe?
>
> On Sat, Feb 19, 2011 at 8:16 AM, Ivan Georgiev<yngwiie@bk.ru
> <mailto:yngwiie@bk.ru>> wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> I am testing 0.7.2 on a Windows 2003 x64 system(one node)
> and I am having
> the following problem.
> My insertion speed is relatively slow, so the memtables do
> not get full and
> the actual flushing is triggered by
> memtable_flush_after_mins, this happens
> on the hour mark. My problem with 0.7.2 is that when that
> happens, the cpu
> spikes to 25% overall usage (x4 Xeon) and the operation
> takes anywhere from
> 2 to 4 minutes, leaving the node not responding during
> that time. This has
> forced to me to increase the rpc timeout option to beyond
> what i feel
> comfortable with.
> I have run multiple tests with 0.7.0 and 0.7.2 with the
> same dataset and the
> results are consistent. During the same operation 0.7.0
> takes about 10
> seconds to complete vs. 2 to 4 minutes for 0.7.2. I am
> attaching a log with
> the timestamps from one such flushing of 0.7.2. Please let
> me know if there
> is anything i can do to speed up and get results similar
> to 0.7.0.
>
> Regards:
> Ivan
>
> This is the log of the operations which took most time
> during the flush
> operation. Using 0.7.0, with the same number of operations
> the flushing
> takes less than 10 seconds.
>
> INFO 01:36:44,906 Enqueuing flush of
> Memtable-ArchiveFiles.6f776e65724944@1225856921(1619949
> bytes, 34467
> operations)
> INFO 01:37:47,375 Completed flushing
> C:\Storage\data\Storage\ArchiveFiles.68617368-f-3-Data.db
> (5549187 bytes)
> INFO 01:37:47,375 Writing
> Memtable-ArchiveFiles.6e616d65@978152661(1619949
> bytes, 34467 operations)
> INFO 01:37:47,375 Enqueuing flush of
> Memtable-ArchiveFiles.706172656e74466f6c6465724944@2097700961(1619949
> bytes,
> 34467 operations)
> INFO 01:38:51,343 Completed flushing
> C:\Storage\data\Storage\ArchiveFiles.6e616d65-f-3-Data.db
> (3820265 bytes)
> INFO 01:38:51,343 Writing
> Memtable-ArchiveFiles.6f776e65724944@1225856921(1619949
> bytes, 34467
> operations)
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> --
> http://twitter.com/tjake
|