cassandra-user mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From buddhasystem <potek...@bnl.gov>
Subject Re: What is the most solid version of Cassandra? No secondary indexes needed.
Date Tue, 15 Feb 2011 22:42:40 GMT

Thank you Attila!

We will indeed have a few months of "breaking in". I suppose I'll
keep my fingers crossed and see that 0.7.X is very stable. So I'll
deploy 0.7.1 -- I will need to apply all the patches, there is no
cumulative download, is that correct?


Attila Babo wrote:
> 
> 0.6.8 is stable and production ready, the later versions of the 0.6
> branch has "issues". No offense, but the 0.7 branch is fairly unstable
> from my experience. I have reproduced all the open bugs with a
> production dataset, even when tried to rebuild it from scratch after a
> complete loss.
> 
> If you have a few month before going to production your best bet is
> still 0.7.1 as it will stabilize but the switch between versions is
> painful.
> 
> /Attila
> 
> 

-- 
View this message in context: http://cassandra-user-incubator-apache-org.3065146.n2.nabble.com/What-is-the-most-solid-version-of-Cassandra-No-secondary-indexes-needed-tp6028966p6029622.html
Sent from the cassandra-user@incubator.apache.org mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

Mime
View raw message