Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-cassandra-user-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 36575 invoked from network); 15 Nov 2010 23:05:26 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 15 Nov 2010 23:05:26 -0000 Received: (qmail 90388 invoked by uid 500); 15 Nov 2010 23:05:51 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-cassandra-user-archive@cassandra.apache.org Received: (qmail 90249 invoked by uid 500); 15 Nov 2010 23:05:51 -0000 Mailing-List: contact user-help@cassandra.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: user@cassandra.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list user@cassandra.apache.org Received: (qmail 90241 invoked by uid 99); 15 Nov 2010 23:05:51 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 15 Nov 2010 23:05:51 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.7 required=10.0 tests=FREEMAIL_FROM,FS_LARGE_PERCENT2,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of rev.chip@gmail.com designates 74.125.83.172 as permitted sender) Received: from [74.125.83.172] (HELO mail-pv0-f172.google.com) (74.125.83.172) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 15 Nov 2010 23:05:44 +0000 Received: by pvc21 with SMTP id 21so3682pvc.31 for ; Mon, 15 Nov 2010 15:05:23 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from :user-agent:mime-version:to:subject:references:in-reply-to :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=hDoW+pCCxQj45H57UkrESkl5u93D5GFDYd8XE+ayOYA=; b=Pan2nBFua6iXIq7+bRlN7tk0Z4sBvFcsRrLHMX4DyQ/od7vMznWhdv9Krb9s+3JLEZ T/LJWO43RTE7VUNmGbMxj6q0SP2oh63LOauHW+5Ub9BPVkEEGis+ZcMN+CcViPA/viOW 6trbm/vXDNIOKnM59PqlHiRL/fIbjIfQaiK3Q= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject:references :in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=VMs0xZ2tF3T6lZhuYePJtNiZ53mSQgNbW+dDHudEYe96mqFHOfcjlRx1WKr00rIJca p9OoG5BrnMKIYczVTi62TGMn7R/1lSaXH3330qELFpzqsof3Zgd/z1xOoTVdRUWUMz/Q ohtEDEUFcmya9jN3S7f7bI74SF0sasBjnc1Lc= Received: by 10.142.229.21 with SMTP id b21mr5509813wfh.261.1289862323610; Mon, 15 Nov 2010 15:05:23 -0800 (PST) Received: from [192.168.11.104] ([76.197.6.52]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id w42sm550778wfh.3.2010.11.15.15.05.22 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Mon, 15 Nov 2010 15:05:22 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <4CE1BCAE.7090409@gmail.com> Date: Mon, 15 Nov 2010 15:05:18 -0800 From: Reverend Chip User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.1; en-US; rv:1.9.2.12) Gecko/20101027 Thunderbird/3.1.6 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: user@cassandra.apache.org Subject: Re: repair takes two days, and ends up stuck: stream at 1096% (yes, really) References: <4CE18415.9030303@gmail.com> <4CE1A091.8070400@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On 11/15/2010 2:01 PM, Jonathan Ellis wrote: > On Mon, Nov 15, 2010 at 3:05 PM, Reverend Chip wrote: >> >> There are a lot of non-tmps that were not included in the load >> figure. Having stopped the server and deleted tmp files, the data are >> still using way more space than "ring" claimed -- and too much for >> "cleanup" to work, as well: >> >> Filesystem Size Used Avail Use% Mounted on >> /dev/mapper/flashcache >> 932G 723G 162G 82% /var/lib/cassandra/data > I take it you restarted it? Does it show the correct load now? I didn't expect that to be helpful. But I'll try it. >> Given that the previous situation included incomplete replication, I >> can't just kill the node and let it repopulate. So I can either magick >> up more disk space or reload the whole cluster. :-( > You can move the data files do a node with more space, compact there, > and move them back, but if you don't care about the data rebuilding is > more straightforward. The nodes are configured identically. What's the point in just compacting, anyway? Do these files contain duplicate data, then?