Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-cassandra-user-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 47831 invoked from network); 12 Oct 2010 21:38:18 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 12 Oct 2010 21:38:18 -0000 Received: (qmail 51234 invoked by uid 500); 12 Oct 2010 21:38:16 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-cassandra-user-archive@cassandra.apache.org Received: (qmail 51204 invoked by uid 500); 12 Oct 2010 21:38:16 -0000 Mailing-List: contact user-help@cassandra.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: user@cassandra.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list user@cassandra.apache.org Received: (qmail 51196 invoked by uid 99); 12 Oct 2010 21:38:16 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 12 Oct 2010 21:38:16 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=10.0 tests=FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of jianing@gmail.com designates 209.85.213.172 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.213.172] (HELO mail-yx0-f172.google.com) (209.85.213.172) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 12 Oct 2010 21:38:08 +0000 Received: by yxp4 with SMTP id 4so1579236yxp.31 for ; Tue, 12 Oct 2010 14:37:47 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:received:in-reply-to :references:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=ur9/B5EaWaZm/aqELxYipbeC4vpotwqyl1q7u/A6Ov4=; b=g48P0iQbhfdVFLaJtNiT3xu3VHrEoqHZr21hV17G4y4J7KRia/agAOeb/ji8sisulJ N3miiO9WkYTJnSFSzKHn2ShdLwEnCt0kpB+RfQrDhkkDJkcZcwbks0VeM4TKH+a+sKJH PHj7s2pBevdMkF69VR6oTI62dbuPFTsyy5xCE= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; b=NFPTejZFOXmc0bgy/FzJix3P0caUJ/UXWcPkB3t2QCueBg8FegHe/UkYHexdQuEmYP AszMsvQJ5IvfqMpeFzFONLx9owoUi4NK+fbVlnUY9OpWFSzItqVYbMONbYoM2w5O0pXN 9bgI7n6SoBsxoFAyOL3C5MQ+oaKGbzU6iwNyc= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.42.100.142 with SMTP id a14mr3122298ico.204.1286919467131; Tue, 12 Oct 2010 14:37:47 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.42.6.11 with HTTP; Tue, 12 Oct 2010 14:37:47 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Tue, 12 Oct 2010 14:37:47 -0700 Message-ID: Subject: Re: get_range_slices problem with super columns From: Jianing Hu To: user@cassandra.apache.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Was anyone able to reproduce this bug? On Wed, Oct 6, 2010 at 6:19 PM, Jianing Hu wrote: > I'm seeing cases where the count in slicerange predicate is not > respected. This is only happening for super columns. I'm running > Cassandra 0.6.4 in a single node. > > Steps to reproduce, using the Keyspace1.Super1 CF: > * insert three super columns, bar1 bar 2, and bar3, under the same key > * delete bar1 > * insert bar1 again > * run a get_range_slices on Super1, with start=bar1, finish=bar3, and count=1 > * I expected only bar1 to be returned, but both both bar1 and bar2 are > returned. bar3 isn't, though. so count is somewhat respected. > > I've filed a jira with a test script attached: > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CASSANDRA-1591 > > Thanks for any advice. > > - Jianing >