Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-cassandra-user-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 14809 invoked from network); 14 Oct 2010 14:59:33 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 14 Oct 2010 14:59:33 -0000 Received: (qmail 73108 invoked by uid 500); 14 Oct 2010 14:59:32 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-cassandra-user-archive@cassandra.apache.org Received: (qmail 72979 invoked by uid 500); 14 Oct 2010 14:59:28 -0000 Mailing-List: contact user-help@cassandra.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: user@cassandra.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list user@cassandra.apache.org Received: (qmail 72971 invoked by uid 99); 14 Oct 2010 14:59:28 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 14 Oct 2010 14:59:28 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=10.0 tests=SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [65.49.60.174] (HELO serenity.runawaynet.com) (65.49.60.174) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 14 Oct 2010 14:59:18 +0000 Received: from [192.168.15.230] (unknown [111.235.206.174]) by serenity.runawaynet.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5831735CA3F for ; Thu, 14 Oct 2010 07:58:54 -0700 (PDT) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1081) Subject: Re: Silent Crash From: Nicholas Knight In-Reply-To: <1287067033.10982.7.camel@erebus.lan> Date: Thu, 14 Oct 2010 22:58:48 +0800 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: <4CCF43D2-8CDD-407E-BE83-3E816A5DDBC4@runawaynet.com> References: <4CB67A9D.5060805@real.com> <4CB69806.2050602@real.com> <1287067033.10982.7.camel@erebus.lan> To: user@cassandra.apache.org X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1081) X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org On Oct 14, 2010, at 10:37 PM, Eric Evans wrote: >> sorry to say, your best bet is to upgrade=20 >=20 > I would actually start with some large test builds, kernels work well > for this. Use a high concurrency (> 4). Whether or not those fail, assuming x86, download memtest86+ and boot = it. Symptoms like this tend to be bad RAM, and it's also the easiest = thing to test (and, if broken, fix).=20 -NK=