Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-cassandra-user-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 92518 invoked from network); 20 Jul 2010 21:04:15 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 20 Jul 2010 21:04:15 -0000 Received: (qmail 12515 invoked by uid 500); 20 Jul 2010 21:04:13 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-cassandra-user-archive@cassandra.apache.org Received: (qmail 12422 invoked by uid 500); 20 Jul 2010 21:04:13 -0000 Mailing-List: contact user-help@cassandra.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: user@cassandra.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list user@cassandra.apache.org Received: (qmail 12414 invoked by uid 99); 20 Jul 2010 21:04:13 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 20 Jul 2010 21:04:13 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=10.0 tests=FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of jbellis@gmail.com designates 74.125.83.44 as permitted sender) Received: from [74.125.83.44] (HELO mail-gw0-f44.google.com) (74.125.83.44) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 20 Jul 2010 21:04:06 +0000 Received: by gwj19 with SMTP id 19so3488523gwj.31 for ; Tue, 20 Jul 2010 14:03:39 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:mime-version:received:in-reply-to :references:from:date:message-id:subject:to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=YNyY1HNK/2fp2eOfrGGi2D+e1LkxJy3c/ZLK8n3eRZc=; b=Ai/vtJI1JP1pMj5g8UlsYzZ8e5sRjJ+X3Xl6B7eO30Ot9GiHDilt3Po/z3CaT+7Paa EvDJ0cS9YJkSJNgCQPI4ZBCz0v3/sPt/0wOMpuLKnmQxkG/r1C9bUxl36PUn8MKZsNpG eHQLPawZ/6LKSE3rgRxqQ9JTVrgvFFwVbrpGc= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=a16wjVoagYX5pRDGgD+AQCWNQ+A9giRvbd2vXKuWc7Aax1WwBCIThgZmVJnsHmqmrN P3wweEkETmwc93BXrOrK0iQk7okDqetHV3z/n6vlYWhfjG6tqVH0BeJ8iiu7H0JC42mS TV2jywAGuNysbtCTTgxpSyP49cUfc4zj/b33c= Received: by 10.100.106.6 with SMTP id e6mr5987117anc.111.1279659815322; Tue, 20 Jul 2010 14:03:35 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.231.194.77 with HTTP; Tue, 20 Jul 2010 14:03:15 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: <1278605626.2947.62.camel@dell-desktop.example.com> From: Jonathan Ellis Date: Tue, 20 Jul 2010 16:03:15 -0500 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Understanding atomicity in Cassandra To: user@cassandra.apache.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org 2010/7/20 Patricio Echag=FCe : > Would it be bad design to store all the data that need to be > consistent under one big key? That really depends how unnatural it is from a query perspective. :) --=20 Jonathan Ellis Project Chair, Apache Cassandra co-founder of Riptano, the source for professional Cassandra support http://riptano.com