Return-Path: 
 <user-return-7228-apmail-cassandra-user-archive=cassandra.apache.org@cassandra.apache.org>
Delivered-To: apmail-cassandra-user-archive@www.apache.org
Received: (qmail 89289 invoked from network); 3 Jul 2010 15:59:47 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3)
  by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 3 Jul 2010 15:59:47 -0000
Received: (qmail 43185 invoked by uid 500); 3 Jul 2010 15:59:46 -0000
Delivered-To: apmail-cassandra-user-archive@cassandra.apache.org
Received: (qmail 43141 invoked by uid 500); 3 Jul 2010 15:59:45 -0000
Mailing-List: contact user-help@cassandra.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:user-help@cassandra.apache.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:user-unsubscribe@cassandra.apache.org>
List-Post: <mailto:user@cassandra.apache.org>
List-Id: <user.cassandra.apache.org>
Reply-To: user@cassandra.apache.org
Delivered-To: mailing list user@cassandra.apache.org
Received: (qmail 43133 invoked by uid 99); 3 Jul 2010 15:59:45 -0000
Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230)
    by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 03 Jul 2010 15:59:45 +0000
X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=4.4 required=10.0
	tests=FREEMAIL_ENVFROM_END_DIGIT,FREEMAIL_FROM,HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL
X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org
Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of sahmed1020@gmail.com designates
 74.125.82.44 as permitted sender)
Received: from [74.125.82.44] (HELO mail-ww0-f44.google.com) (74.125.82.44)
    by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 03 Jul 2010 15:59:38 +0000
Received: by wwb24 with SMTP id 24so1134923wwb.25
        for <user@cassandra.apache.org>; Sat, 03 Jul 2010 08:59:17 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
        h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:received:date:message-id
         :subject:from:to:content-type;
        bh=VmxJBfaWe1ckmEIzA51AUShDRrGLrkMtW66hTjkkZd4=;
        b=Or9ab3i3nJS+TC+W7Cqhsj8Go78rgMRJVTV1GdgiasqMHk9q+Y5q9flM24zdlGy/h7
         qkXKAuFmCmsv2VX3Nf8THhSmp/3+4bJmVcHr7TjjT6oQ80r4XG8q/HuunOLRfQ2TG7Wk
         DjGVJICW3I2lBYKUaxxfgBq8QddKmEXN9nAWo=
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws;
        d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
        h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type;
        b=niz3yIcz+c2KGSoCZrnD2LhIkO8o7SWrnYBj3FuKdGFo7nYC8xzswebrYvXHso7rQr
         Cex+s7drHUq07DYUb2zUaRbls4MRy3vUkScYsilVM0iyWSdDdquPSn5rgUSCA6Qb5k3Y
         FDRLJRiyxwsV5W71XC4hbidg8dK04Q7DUo6AY=
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.227.157.68 with SMTP id a4mr525555wbx.5.1278172757856;
 Sat, 03
	Jul 2010 08:59:17 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.216.45.206 with HTTP; Sat, 3 Jul 2010 08:59:17 -0700 (PDT)
Date: Sat, 3 Jul 2010 11:59:17 -0400
Message-ID: <AANLkTilyx6IYTVDnDWxif68jNgdeEf9pzRWIHooKKH0u@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: key data type and performance + multi-tenancy suggestions
From: S Ahmed <sahmed1020@gmail.com>
To: user@cassandra.apache.org
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=0016e659f482319729048a7dc97f
X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org

--0016e659f482319729048a7dc97f
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1

1. Is there a difference in performance when you have keys that are int
versus string/datetime?

2. When designing for multi-tenancy, what suggestions do you guys have?
    My idea thus far would be do prefix keys with the website like:
      com.example.keyname

  Seeing as keyspaces can't be built dynamically, this is probably the only
approach correct?

--0016e659f482319729048a7dc97f
Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

1. Is there a difference in performance when you have keys that are int ver=
sus string/datetime?=A0<div><br></div><div>2. When designing for multi-tena=
ncy, what suggestions do you guys have?</div><div>=A0=A0 =A0My idea thus fa=
r would be do prefix keys with the website like:</div>
<div>=A0=A0 =A0 =A0com.example.keyname</div><div><br></div><div>=A0=A0Seein=
g as keyspaces can&#39;t be built dynamically, this is probably the only ap=
proach correct?</div>

--0016e659f482319729048a7dc97f--