I am also interested in seeing how the performance of Cassandra performs on various virtual platforms. 

On Wed, Jul 7, 2010 at 2:15 PM, Andrew Rollins <andrew@localytics.com> wrote:
On Wed, Jul 7, 2010 at 2:27 AM, Michael Dürgner <m...@duergner.de> wrote:
Have you done some testing with small nodes already? Because from what we saw trying to run IO bound services on small instances is, that their IO performance is really bad compared to other instance types as you can read in several blogs.

Would be interesting to hear, if a Cassandra cluster can handle that.

I have actually.

I tested on 10 small nodes on Amazon EC2, each with 1 EBS disk. I've been avoiding large nodes for now since they are 4x the cost of a small, and 10 small would translate to 2.5 large nodes. We figured it's better to slice things into more nodes, since 2 or 3 nodes would mean large chunks of data would need to be moved if a node failed.

Under pure write loads with a fairly default config and 3x replication, we achieved 1,000 writes per second and probably could have pushed it a little bit more (perhaps to 2k per second). Write speed barely slowed even as we pushed past 50 million keys. Keys were 255 bytes with a single column containing 768 bytes.

Things got much worse when we introduced reads, however. We did a 50/50 read write split. IO went up, and nodes failed a couple hours into the test with out of memory errors. My theory is that the reads caused much more IO, which caused writes to get backed up in memory.

I've had success in the past with RAID striping on EBS volumes. I was able to get nearly 4x improvement on a small instance with MySQL, so my next thing would be to try RAID with Cassandra.

Also, another theory is that CommitLogSync in batch mode might allow me to effectively rate limit writing so that I don't overflow memory.


- Andrew

-Richard L. Burton III