cassandra-user mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Charles Woerner / IMAP <charleswoer...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: http://voltdb.com/ ?
Date Wed, 09 Jun 2010 22:13:17 GMT
I don't know, I'd ask them directly.  When I looked at it I was more  
interested in the throughput and acid compliance aspects of it.

--
Thanks,

Charles Woerner

On Jun 9, 2010, at 2:56 PM, "Parsacala Jr, Nazario R. [Tech]" <nazario.parsacala@gs.com

 > wrote:

> So what is the size limit for voltdb ..?
>
>
>
> From: Charles Woerner / IMAP [mailto:charleswoerner@gmail.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, June 09, 2010 5:55 PM
> To: user@cassandra.apache.org
> Subject: Re: http://voltdb.com/ ?
>
>
>
> Totally agree that Cassandra and voltdb fulfill different needs.  I  
> would say mysql cluster (ndbd) would be a more appropriate  
> competitor.  50tb?  Yes and no - it's designed to integrate with a  
> system called vertica which does scale to that size, but as a stand  
> alone system I don't believe so.
>
>
>
> --
>
> Thanks,
>
>
>
> Charles Woerner
>
>
> On Jun 9, 2010, at 2:35 PM, Ned Wolpert <ned.wolpert@imemories.com>  
> wrote:
>
> As far as finding its competitors go; If you need acid compliance,  
> Cassandra isn't in the list. If you need 50TB of data, is VoltDB in  
> the list?
>
> On Wed, Jun 9, 2010 at 2:30 PM, Charles Woerner / IMAP <charleswoerner@gmail.com 
> > wrote:
>
> I would disagree with that assessment.  My take is that Voltdb is a  
> high throughput, fault tolerant transaction processing db as opposed  
> to a caching system or key value store.  It's easy to get hung up on  
> the in-memory nature of it but I believe that it is both fault  
> tolerant through redundant copies of the data and fully acid  
> compliant.
>
>
>
> --
>
> Thanks,
>
>
>
> Charles Woerner
>
>
> On Jun 9, 2010, at 12:09 PM, AJ Slater <aj@zuno.com> wrote:
>
> Its proper competitors are stuff like redis and memcached.
>
> On Fri, Jun 4, 2010 at 8:19 AM, Jones, Nick <nick.jones@amd.com>  
> wrote:
>
> I saw a tweet about claiming far better performance to Cassandra.   
> After following up, I found out it requires the entire DB to reside  
> in memory across the nodes.
>
>
>
> Nick Jones
>
>
>
> From: Denis Haskin [mailto:denis@haskinferguson.net]
> Sent: Friday, June 04, 2010 10:17 AM
> To: user
> Subject: http://voltdb.com/ ?
>
>
>
> Anybody looked at VoltDB?  I haven't dug into it, but curious about  
> it.
>
>
> dwh
>
>
>
>
>
>
> -- 
> Virtually, Ned Wolpert
>
> "Settle thy studies, Faustus, and begin..."   --Marlowe

Mime
View raw message