Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-cassandra-user-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 40469 invoked from network); 4 May 2010 21:50:03 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 4 May 2010 21:50:03 -0000 Received: (qmail 39776 invoked by uid 500); 4 May 2010 21:50:02 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-cassandra-user-archive@cassandra.apache.org Received: (qmail 39756 invoked by uid 500); 4 May 2010 21:50:02 -0000 Mailing-List: contact user-help@cassandra.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: user@cassandra.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list user@cassandra.apache.org Received: (qmail 39748 invoked by uid 99); 4 May 2010 21:50:02 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 04 May 2010 21:50:02 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.2 required=10.0 tests=AWL,FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of jbellis@gmail.com designates 74.125.82.172 as permitted sender) Received: from [74.125.82.172] (HELO mail-wy0-f172.google.com) (74.125.82.172) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 04 May 2010 21:49:57 +0000 Received: by wyb32 with SMTP id 32so1009009wyb.31 for ; Tue, 04 May 2010 14:49:36 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:mime-version:received:in-reply-to :references:from:date:message-id:subject:to:content-type; bh=NKlXf5rlt5dIDsvH2Qap9WkOvnsS1hOmdvW/jEZI9tc=; b=CD/7/N/P9BBeO/RIbepfP6Nplxl3Ow3UDVxtJ1T5AQuxyG6D/FeTIDnx2tSw1nnFDt /+LPuDpAqMsYDN7hONnAzc26TJzzShGDw6/xTiUGubzeFTyq2p04VDiHU21hL1ybaZ76 NGzmXjPaQP7moLb0hDMYsLvc/Wd+sU7yyMBCo= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :content-type; b=J6I8pD5gy4BR8tElqp0PMoseIFAcSBkfG4Fu5LwZt7BS1Y20+V3h9yNszUh/cwAjNd RKV4WCd0DHcC+Lm7gUylgJadRBuuxU1S3gPuZlEZ+AUrnQ9MgN3g8PxmLT/u09iZtQ8T PNElme610MMZWdwaHl7hJFV6sGCQrj+//NrmY= Received: by 10.216.153.195 with SMTP id f45mr3349268wek.137.1273009776127; Tue, 04 May 2010 14:49:36 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.216.22.10 with HTTP; Tue, 4 May 2010 14:49:15 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: <568eeb2e1d814eb4c8733fea0249448f@localhost> <88c309657dd717fb224c3dc9e99d2580@localhost> <9B6BDB83-4CA9-412B-BF4A-0DFF70C353D8@thelastpickle.com> From: Jonathan Ellis Date: Tue, 4 May 2010 16:49:15 -0500 Message-ID: Subject: Re: strange get_range_slices behaviour v0.6.1 To: user@cassandra.apache.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 On Tue, May 4, 2010 at 4:17 PM, aaron wrote: > I was noticing cases under the random partitioner where keys I expected to > be returned > were not. Can you give a little advice on the expected behaviour of > get_range_slices > with the RP and I'll try to write a JUnit for it. e.g. Is it essentially > the same as > under the OPP but order is undefined? Right. That's why it warns you when you specify an end key under RP; I can't think of a scenario where that would make sense. -- Jonathan Ellis Project Chair, Apache Cassandra co-founder of Riptano, the source for professional Cassandra support http://riptano.com