Return-Path: 
 <user-return-4406-apmail-cassandra-user-archive=cassandra.apache.org@cassandra.apache.org>
Delivered-To: apmail-cassandra-user-archive@www.apache.org
Received: (qmail 49615 invoked from network); 15 Apr 2010 14:50:02 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3)
  by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 15 Apr 2010 14:50:02 -0000
Received: (qmail 26191 invoked by uid 500); 15 Apr 2010 14:50:01 -0000
Delivered-To: apmail-cassandra-user-archive@cassandra.apache.org
Received: (qmail 26166 invoked by uid 500); 15 Apr 2010 14:50:01 -0000
Mailing-List: contact user-help@cassandra.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:user-help@cassandra.apache.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:user-unsubscribe@cassandra.apache.org>
List-Post: <mailto:user@cassandra.apache.org>
List-Id: <user.cassandra.apache.org>
Reply-To: user@cassandra.apache.org
Delivered-To: mailing list user@cassandra.apache.org
Received: (qmail 26154 invoked by uid 99); 15 Apr 2010 14:50:01 -0000
Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230)
    by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 15 Apr 2010 14:50:01 +0000
X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=3.2 required=10.0
	tests=HTML_IMAGE_ONLY_04,HTML_MESSAGE,SPF_NEUTRAL
X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org
Received-SPF: neutral (nike.apache.org: local policy)
Received: from [74.125.83.172] (HELO mail-pv0-f172.google.com) (74.125.83.172)
    by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 15 Apr 2010 14:49:53 +0000
Received: by pvf33 with SMTP id 33so857679pvf.31
        for <user@cassandra.apache.org>; Thu, 15 Apr 2010 07:49:32 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.142.4.1 with SMTP id 1mr168095wfd.50.1271342971818;
        Thu, 15 Apr 2010 07:49:31 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-yx0-f186.google.com (mail-yx0-f186.google.com
 [209.85.210.186])
        by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id 39sm422507yxd.60.2010.04.15.07.49.31
        (version=SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5);
        Thu, 15 Apr 2010 07:49:31 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by yxe16 with SMTP id 16so853282yxe.9
        for <user@cassandra.apache.org>; Thu, 15 Apr 2010 07:49:31 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.151.155.14 with HTTP; Thu, 15 Apr 2010 07:49:30 -0700 (PDT)
Date: Thu, 15 Apr 2010 09:49:30 -0500
Received: by 10.151.92.4 with SMTP id u4mr396661ybl.229.1271342971007;
 Thu, 15
	Apr 2010 07:49:31 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <u2o815edeff1004150749ma9668945g429c6cabe8e3987a@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: framed transport
From: Lee Parker <lee@socialagency.com>
To: user@cassandra.apache.org
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=000e0cd240c62cb3d00484479a7a
X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org

--000e0cd240c62cb3d00484479a7a
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1

What is the benefit of moving to framed transport as opposed to buffered
transport?

Lee Parker
lee@spredfast.com

[image: Spredfast]

--000e0cd240c62cb3d00484479a7a
Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1

What is the benefit of moving to framed transport as opposed to buffered transport?<div><br></div><div title="signature"><div>Lee Parker</div>
<div><a href="mailto:lee@spredfast.com">lee@spredfast.com</a></div>
<p><img src="http://spredfast.com/images/logo_spredfast_ondark_r_220x40.gif" alt="Spredfast"></p></div>

--000e0cd240c62cb3d00484479a7a--