Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-cassandra-user-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 30476 invoked from network); 8 Apr 2010 18:26:52 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 8 Apr 2010 18:26:52 -0000 Received: (qmail 55678 invoked by uid 500); 8 Apr 2010 18:26:51 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-cassandra-user-archive@cassandra.apache.org Received: (qmail 55661 invoked by uid 500); 8 Apr 2010 18:26:51 -0000 Mailing-List: contact user-help@cassandra.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: user@cassandra.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list user@cassandra.apache.org Received: (qmail 55653 invoked by uid 99); 8 Apr 2010 18:26:51 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 08 Apr 2010 18:26:51 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=4.5 required=10.0 tests=AWL,FREEMAIL_ENVFROM_END_DIGIT,FREEMAIL_FROM,HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of peter78@gmail.com designates 209.85.222.190 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.222.190] (HELO mail-pz0-f190.google.com) (209.85.222.190) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 08 Apr 2010 18:26:47 +0000 Received: by pzk28 with SMTP id 28so2321608pzk.11 for ; Thu, 08 Apr 2010 11:26:26 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :from:date:received:message-id:subject:to:content-type; bh=mn8kawq7VVRZGiekBU83xisPwHEg9ba8muWvV5PJl+0=; b=ciy/1VC58x8Jdl8ROxJIY+FdgWeAxVSqNy7ON3iK0Kf4C/thxa7d0NgUNOj+nzhriT IsQQTMU5+kcdi/zc3hdfO94vCJBPI0O4Sj0cUodwleB3sgI/ho9NafBS+AMyp+fAHB7P SsF+nfiRu5S6hdYtMJiuw44T3+f6NX85ReRgw= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :content-type; b=Zy2zQd3mMbXRFo/4juC3h+yvdvnwdEgFU7f/Fvt7glZyzh0F+8pMwtOwDKG5YovHOu W5mHl6l9gCbx27QyaHSoYHVslJMSOfv1CEKyNfKpJNhpltJwO1DLiVvGSP8bD26uM2Yt G9Jy4R2OHyTK9UHjrcTJItN7NyJxvQVHPpkac= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.142.218.4 with HTTP; Thu, 8 Apr 2010 11:26:06 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: <4BBD13DF.7000405@fourkitchens.com> From: Peter Chang Date: Thu, 8 Apr 2010 11:26:06 -0700 Received: by 10.142.208.5 with SMTP id f5mr369956wfg.295.1270751186299; Thu, 08 Apr 2010 11:26:26 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: Subject: Re: Is this sentence slightly inaccurate To: user@cassandra.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=000e0cd17e020eae0a0483bdd135 --000e0cd17e020eae0a0483bdd135 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Sorry, I've read through the docs (although not too recently) and have followed this mailing list for a bit. But I haven't seen how it's possible to iterate with RP? Could you kindly point out to me where it shows how to do this? TIA. On Wed, Apr 7, 2010 at 4:37 PM, Benjamin Black wrote: > It was not, but is now. > > On Wed, Apr 7, 2010 at 4:23 PM, David Strauss > wrote: > > On 2010-04-07 23:00, Benjamin Black wrote: > >> If you are using RP and your own, secondary indices, you have no way > >> to access rows except by get on the key. Thus, if you lose or corrupt > >> your indices, you may no longer know all your row keys. With OPP and > >> range queries, you can discover them. Cold comfort, imo. > > > > Is it possible to iterate through RP keys? I've gotten mixed answers. > > > > -- > > David Strauss > > | david@fourkitchens.com > > Four Kitchens > > | http://fourkitchens.com > > | +1 512 454 6659 [office] > > | +1 512 870 8453 [direct] > > > > > --000e0cd17e020eae0a0483bdd135 Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Sorry, I've read through the docs (although not too recently) and have = followed this mailing list for a bit. But I haven't seen how it's p= ossible to iterate with RP? Could you kindly point out to me where it shows= how to do this? TIA.

On Wed, Apr 7, 2010 at 4:37 PM, Benjamin Bla= ck <b@b3k.us> wrote:
It was not, but is now.

On Wed, Apr 7, 2010 at 4:23 PM, David Strauss <david@fourkitchens.com> wrote:
> On 2010-04-07 23:00, Benjamin Black wrote:
>> If you are using RP and your own, secondary indices, you have no w= ay
>> to access rows except by get on the key. =A0Thus, if you lose or c= orrupt
>> your indices, you may no longer know all your row keys. =A0With OP= P and
>> range queries, you can discover them. =A0Cold comfort, imo.
>
> Is it possible to iterate through RP keys? I've gotten mixed answe= rs.
>
> --
> David Strauss
> =A0 | david@fourkitchens.com=
> Four Kitchens
> =A0 | http://fou= rkitchens.com
> =A0 | +1 512 454 6659 [office]
> =A0 | +1 512 870 8453 [direct]
>
>

--000e0cd17e020eae0a0483bdd135--