Return-Path: 
 <user-return-4060-apmail-cassandra-user-archive=cassandra.apache.org@cassandra.apache.org>
Delivered-To: apmail-cassandra-user-archive@www.apache.org
Received: (qmail 91206 invoked from network); 8 Apr 2010 00:16:51 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3)
  by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 8 Apr 2010 00:16:51 -0000
Received: (qmail 69412 invoked by uid 500); 8 Apr 2010 00:16:50 -0000
Delivered-To: apmail-cassandra-user-archive@cassandra.apache.org
Received: (qmail 69394 invoked by uid 500); 8 Apr 2010 00:16:50 -0000
Mailing-List: contact user-help@cassandra.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:user-help@cassandra.apache.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:user-unsubscribe@cassandra.apache.org>
List-Post: <mailto:user@cassandra.apache.org>
List-Id: <user.cassandra.apache.org>
Reply-To: user@cassandra.apache.org
Delivered-To: mailing list user@cassandra.apache.org
Received: (qmail 69386 invoked by uid 99); 8 Apr 2010 00:16:50 -0000
Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230)
    by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 08 Apr 2010 00:16:50 +0000
X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.2 required=10.0
	tests=FREEMAIL_FROM,HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL
X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org
Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of jerdavis.cassandra@gmail.com
 designates 209.85.222.190 as permitted sender)
Received: from [209.85.222.190] (HELO mail-pz0-f190.google.com)
 (209.85.222.190)
    by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 08 Apr 2010 00:16:42 +0000
Received: by pzk28 with SMTP id 28so1626560pzk.11
        for <user@cassandra.apache.org>; Wed, 07 Apr 2010 17:16:21 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
        h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:date:received:message-id
         :subject:from:to:content-type;
        bh=Dk7KcynfxzABZqwoDb+xixmaX7Vsjtb8VFJV8awk4ZE=;
        b=ufcCrZp6L0jKvO98fPnSdCJLbl1w+8aVcXjcbW1YNbnXCm/U//dfsZ55nNAk/kDzSU
         c0hyAPRcofN0aUrZ3QmgDQju6rBwCmVs4SWMlsQ7tvwgU9on9tyobfWRocG1vHbxRGbA
         X9Uyi3byu3IFX8M5pifVIlL14kM5zLa36Coi0=
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws;
        d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
        h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type;
        b=vQUQpmq/3eHaOOcXhtOBGf+AgpBr/xAvO2RS/HMI/xsJWx1ut3/JsscwuBJLNOEDIk
         YSDTdn9MDUDsVRhat1aw0CjYyzp2zvkbTy1+TW/f7+j15IeDf5PNA65WWPUDtiHQWD5W
         OsslZDxfmsAAZGEYhrkc7WWcgFBwA3vNjmo+A=
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.143.11.14 with HTTP; Wed, 7 Apr 2010 17:16:21 -0700 (PDT)
Date: Wed, 7 Apr 2010 17:16:21 -0700
Received: by 10.142.4.1 with SMTP id 1mr4231804wfd.50.1270685781286; Wed, 07
	Apr 2010 17:16:21 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <o2m57de3f171004071716h5562b1d2ja90601ea4e1ba45f@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: does compaction of Super Column Family have same limit as compaction
	of Column Family
From: Jeremy Davis <jerdavis.cassandra@gmail.com>
To: user@cassandra.apache.org
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=00504502b7179d61d70483ae9694
X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org

--00504502b7179d61d70483ae9694
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1

Quick question:
There is an open issue with ColumnFamilies growing too large to fit in
memory when compacting..
Does this same limit also apply to SCF? As long as each sub CF is
sufficiently small, etc.

-JD

--00504502b7179d61d70483ae9694
Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1

Quick question:<br>There is an open issue with ColumnFamilies growing too large to fit in memory when compacting..<br>Does this same limit also apply to SCF? As long as each sub CF is sufficiently small, etc.<br><br>-JD<br>

--00504502b7179d61d70483ae9694--