Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-cassandra-user-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 36860 invoked from network); 18 Mar 2010 18:08:43 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 18 Mar 2010 18:08:43 -0000 Received: (qmail 23019 invoked by uid 500); 18 Mar 2010 18:08:43 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-cassandra-user-archive@cassandra.apache.org Received: (qmail 23003 invoked by uid 500); 18 Mar 2010 18:08:43 -0000 Mailing-List: contact user-help@cassandra.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: user@cassandra.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list user@cassandra.apache.org Received: (qmail 22995 invoked by uid 99); 18 Mar 2010 18:08:43 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 18 Mar 2010 18:08:43 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=10.0 tests=FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of schildmeijer@gmail.com designates 209.85.220.216 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.220.216] (HELO mail-fx0-f216.google.com) (209.85.220.216) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 18 Mar 2010 18:08:33 +0000 Received: by fxm8 with SMTP id 8so1733150fxm.25 for ; Thu, 18 Mar 2010 11:08:12 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:references:in-reply-to :mime-version:content-type:message-id:content-transfer-encoding:from :subject:date:to:x-mailer; bh=6aUlRO/TK3vxNPjmFFCJR8IL1bTtda8fnG/e/8hyMv8=; b=iTiiDQM9zoJqpOMZZuVArdUvxTd607oz+N7nACtRuzsZu8zZ26Km522/OUbMca8aDX 5InknOEBPEZ7nYNWfu3OjYN3BzxSURInO8Hf4p5b95ejXp0zSHoL5nwd+Y2tHkG5D0Di UShvsPI6M/5drTQ51Fu5vgE4jYY0F7tf3R9yY= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=references:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:message-id :content-transfer-encoding:from:subject:date:to:x-mailer; b=HZ6AmOpX1sr9rT548DkTB81kJqr0LTxRME6ArBCe9VLu7GrRGn55R5cANYk4xZKpdd MWaTGisnViJGz6mBJKh0VQZuZdJzuk1vnVEX9Wh2HG4UnrjzytF6P8LXfPMIbWzYW5Wz uf8UV/8KLhb5/6bFFAGlWmQAmJ3IqD1B2EEFY= Received: by 10.223.64.84 with SMTP id d20mr3526927fai.76.1268935692284; Thu, 18 Mar 2010 11:08:12 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [192.168.0.152] (h55eb1f49.selukra.dyn.perspektivbredband.net [85.235.31.73]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id 9sm343951fks.56.2010.03.18.11.08.10 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Thu, 18 Mar 2010 11:08:11 -0700 (PDT) References: <1B4EB7A0-01A2-4B91-8C00-51E0E26844E1@robhost.de> In-Reply-To: <1B4EB7A0-01A2-4B91-8C00-51E0E26844E1@robhost.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1077) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Message-Id: <2211500A-81E9-4D97-B3F0-DAEB548F08A1@gmail.com> Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable From: Roger Schildmeijer Subject: Re: write performance thrift interfaces Date: Thu, 18 Mar 2010 19:08:09 +0100 To: user@cassandra.apache.org X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1077) X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Yes, 30 writes / s sounds a little bit poor.=20 Maybe you could show your benchmark code? And what adjustments had to be = done to the CF? // Roger On 18 mar 2010, at 19.03em, Martin Probst (RobHost Support) wrote: > Hi, >=20 > we've tested the write performance on a single and dual node cluster = and the results are strangely poor. We've got about 30 inserts per = second which seems a little bit slow?! The strange about is, that the = node's we've used (single-cpu, 3gb ram, single disk) got a load of = 0.02-0.05 while the inserts run. There is no disk/network bottlenecks, = no swapping. The insert-script reads some values from stdin and inserts = this values into cassandra. So it seems thats the used thrift interface = are the bootleneck (we've tested php, perl, java, results a nearly the = same). We've used version 0.5.1 and the default config with adjusted = ColumnFamilies. >=20 > Are there some hints or suggestions? >=20 > Cheers, > Martin