cassandra-user mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Jonathan Ellis <>
Subject Re: bundled mutations (Deletion+insertion of the same SuperColumn)
Date Mon, 15 Mar 2010 20:49:44 GMT
In that case you should do the insert first, then the delete in a
separate mutation (with, presumably, an older timestamp).

2010/3/15 Ted Zlatanov <>:
> Can there be any assurance that if I specify a Deletion and an insertion
> for a specific SuperColumn in the same batch_mutate() call, they will
> happen atomically?
> In other words I want to make sure readers don't get a missing value for
> that SuperColumn if their read should occur after the Deletion but
> before the insertion.
> Ted

View raw message