cassandra-user mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Jonathan Ellis <jbel...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: Storage format
Date Mon, 01 Mar 2010 23:05:31 GMT
Then you definitely want one row, range queries are slower than we'd
like right now.  (Ticket to fix that:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CASSANDRA-821)

On Mon, Mar 1, 2010 at 5:00 PM, Erik Holstad <erikholstad@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 1, 2010 at 2:51 PM, Jonathan Ellis <jbellis@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> On Mon, Mar 1, 2010 at 4:49 PM, Erik Holstad <erikholstad@gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>> > Haha!
>> > Thanks. Well I'm z little bit worried about this but since the indexes
>> > are
>> > pretty
>> > small I don't think it is going to be too bad. But was mostly thinking
>> > about
>> > performance and and having the index row as a bottleneck for writing,
>> > since
>> > the
>> > partition is per row.
>>
>> Writing N columns to 1 row is faster than writing 1 column to N rows,
>> even when all N are coming from different clients.  Our concurrency
>> story there is excellent.
>
> That sounds good, and the same thing goes for reading, cause that is
> basically
> what I'm looking for, faster reads, not too worried about the writes.
>
> Thanks a lot!
>

Mime
View raw message