Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-cassandra-user-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 23324 invoked from network); 3 Feb 2010 09:16:17 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 3 Feb 2010 09:16:17 -0000 Received: (qmail 68276 invoked by uid 500); 3 Feb 2010 09:16:17 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-cassandra-user-archive@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 68240 invoked by uid 500); 3 Feb 2010 09:16:16 -0000 Mailing-List: contact cassandra-user-help@incubator.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: cassandra-user@incubator.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list cassandra-user@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 68231 invoked by uid 99); 3 Feb 2010 09:16:16 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 03 Feb 2010 09:16:16 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=10.0 tests=SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of enviouser@gmail.com designates 209.85.223.181 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.223.181] (HELO mail-iw0-f181.google.com) (209.85.223.181) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 03 Feb 2010 09:16:09 +0000 Received: by iwn11 with SMTP id 11so1256506iwn.16 for ; Wed, 03 Feb 2010 01:15:49 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=Qjje/G+Cj//n1zxAiK42gBd54aX7uUVIWGecMFsX+6E=; b=ilGbylz8DnuBzHKb3wKqexAGWEZLl+v9YM2gTiVUbnR0WKU/GsKBbuG8Hkfnq9S+jw PfqDUJzMG2UhsqCYRh6Z5996lHvCVzA9zf3ebA7ZuMzoKGUzJdMCF1vSsIsGVGTEPxti Kd5RMWsxbLDhg9yCQ5pPfJSFiQK2oXb4yVSL8= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; b=bBQmj1+5EK+qZ5W3s/Q4vtgxHUzZJ62cPZXItk+w4X60dDuAKJAOyF+tjXwMNnQ5HX ehGtwK7P+V4io0uI9bZ6aucKPWymN1hXqBSqR7Hk0fc7x8oZF4CBkd+8M1Qgc04zmFHH pJ/6K3dz81Tt/VbdKA3KBqzdD+98puwytKCsU= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.231.170.136 with SMTP id d8mr3618946ibz.17.1265188549051; Wed, 03 Feb 2010 01:15:49 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Wed, 3 Feb 2010 14:45:48 +0530 Message-ID: Subject: Re: get_slice() slow if more number of columns present in a SCF. From: envio user To: cassandra-user@incubator.apache.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Hi Nate, On Wed, Feb 3, 2010 at 12:31 AM, Nathan McCall wrote: > Thank you for the benchmarks. What version of Cassandra are you using? I am using 0.5 release. > I had about 80% performance improvement on single node reads after > using a trunk build with the results from > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CASSANDRA-688 (result caching) > and playing around with the configuration. I am not yet running this > in production though, so I cannot provide any real numbers. > Do you any specific config parameters needs to be used for this purpose? > That said, I have no intention of deploying a single node. I keep > seing performance concerns from folks on small or single node > clusters. My impression so far is that Cassandra may not be the right > solution for these types of deployments. As part of evaluation we are testing cassandra with single node. I agree for deployment it is not good having just single node. <> > > What I found to have been most valuable for my evaluation was to get a > good test together with some real data from our system and then add > nodes, remove nodes, break nodes, etc. and watch what happens. Once I > finish with this, it looks like I will have some solid numbers to do > some capacity planning for figuring out exactly how much hardware to > purchase and when I will need to add more. We are just doing some basic tests. If cassandra passes these tests, may be we will do tests you mentioned later. thanks, -Aita