Mailing-List: contact cassandra-user-help@incubator.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: cassandra-user@incubator.apache.org
Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of cemalettin.koc@gmail.com
 designates 209.85.218.227 as permitted sender)
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws;
        d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
        h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to
         :content-type;
        b=J9k78wpx9DxwUkK/HgF1mpuHRAZVaFdlOU8VioKrCYYsoC6cc/RToR6nh1l7fzxgNw
         Ffu2fc3stNcts1a5iDORHgwrtKt7r0MrWUh+Q/D6bWeTDpb3S+VR/v2LEVyt6iAD/8kt
         SIDdylamTGsVEz3VPbc5NTRNdWkIyx5mH+Qd4=
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <a17e13e71002240015x34c28e3bidd8a31aeca489a1a@mail.gmail.com>
References: <4e0b5fd61002231534y5ffc7454t81be52ff005efe7@mail.gmail.com>
	<acfb4fbc1002231554i300b977bw4ed9e6289489c749@mail.gmail.com>
	<5f7770581002231651y7f96bb10pc8e159ceb81ac9cc@mail.gmail.com>
	<4e0b5fd61002232327r6888a5cr85a433dc165be586@mail.gmail.com>
	<a17e13e71002240015x34c28e3bidd8a31aeca489a1a@mail.gmail.com>
From: Cemal <cemalettin.koc@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 24 Feb 2010 10:53:52 +0200
Message-ID: <4e0b5fd61002240053h27e335dbof602badf4c20b093@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Help for choice
To: cassandra-user@incubator.apache.org
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=0015174a0ef267ad8f048054cf35

--0015174a0ef267ad8f048054cf35
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8

Hi,

Maybe I have to tell that we are very eager to evaluate NoSQL approaches and
for a simple case we want evaluate and compare each approaches.

In our case actually our data has not been denormalized yet and we are
suffering from a lot of joins. And because of very much updates in joined
tables we have a great performance problems in some situations. Another
difficulty we are dealing with is scaling problem. By now we have been using
master slaves model but in near future it seems that we will come across a
lot of problems.

By the way I tried to find an article about use cases, pros and cons of each
NoSQL solution but I could not find a detailed explanation about them.

Thanks


On Wed, Feb 24, 2010 at 10:15 AM, Nathan McCall <nate@vervewireless.com>wrote:

> The workload you originally described does not sound like a difficult
> job for a relational database. Do you have any more information on the
> specifics of your access patterns and where you feel that an RDBMS
> might fall short?
>
> -Nate
>
>

--0015174a0ef267ad8f048054cf35
Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Hi,<div><br></div><div>Maybe I have to tell that we are very eager to evalu=
ate NoSQL approaches and for a simple case we want evaluate and compare eac=
h approaches.</div><div><br></div><div>In our case actually our data has no=
t=C2=A0been denormalized yet and we are suffering from a lot of joins. And =
because of very much updates in joined tables we have a great performance p=
roblems in some situations. Another difficulty we are dealing with is scali=
ng problem. By now we have been using master slaves model but in near futur=
e it seems that we will come across a lot of problems.</div>

<div><br></div><div>By the way I tried to find an article about use cases, =
pros and cons of each NoSQL solution but I could not find a detailed explan=
ation about them.=C2=A0</div><div><br></div><div>Thanks</div><div><br></div=
>

<div><br></div><div><br><div class=3D"gmail_quote">On Wed, Feb 24, 2010 at =
10:15 AM, Nathan McCall <span dir=3D"ltr">&lt;<a href=3D"mailto:nate@vervew=
ireless.com">nate@vervewireless.com</a>&gt;</span> wrote:<br><blockquote cl=
ass=3D"gmail_quote" style=3D"margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;p=
adding-left:1ex;">

The workload you originally described does not sound like a difficult<br>
job for a relational database. Do you have any more information on the<br>
specifics of your access patterns and where you feel that an RDBMS<br>
might fall short?<br>
<br>
-Nate<br>
<div><div></div><div class=3D"h5"><br></div></div></blockquote></div></div>

--0015174a0ef267ad8f048054cf35--