Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-cassandra-user-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 74579 invoked from network); 3 Dec 2009 22:36:06 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 3 Dec 2009 22:36:06 -0000 Received: (qmail 7800 invoked by uid 500); 3 Dec 2009 22:36:06 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-cassandra-user-archive@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 7761 invoked by uid 500); 3 Dec 2009 22:36:06 -0000 Mailing-List: contact cassandra-user-help@incubator.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: cassandra-user@incubator.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list cassandra-user@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 7752 invoked by uid 99); 3 Dec 2009 22:36:06 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 03 Dec 2009 22:36:06 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=10.0 tests=SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of jbellis@gmail.com designates 209.85.218.210 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.218.210] (HELO mail-bw0-f210.google.com) (209.85.218.210) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 03 Dec 2009 22:35:58 +0000 Received: by bwz2 with SMTP id 2so1626255bwz.20 for ; Thu, 03 Dec 2009 14:35:38 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :from:date:message-id:subject:to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=keG/THcCz67cmKYjiJyzC11u9+57inQYUQ4tQswNncw=; b=nX5um9dl7sFOHvs5MfJSuu253jsXtlcwmJPQRaGOL4P42TRzTbuh90T7f7KHcTVGs+ CaPgdKyj61RH51TVrn/JHCEVz1cm4vejhhK9UfKHKbdxSS61JV37d0SPgADOueuqpMu4 WIAxURyntG3kxm08g72+OfMJyjQjrI656HzL4= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=csQ4xgHUbvGQ0SzGiqpw7ImK9owclfMNtASglS5VGwKNjKw1xQ/Ds/v4NqN7iV2Iqy mNZFSJpkKwoiVKNNrug3zaNesSOcYJK1ipITqCR7EhWTTKYiDyngpIT58iadGiNgWios AcMdYnQF379jJ2P+pih7xaVjMRAquUHBgGcpo= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.204.156.3 with SMTP id u3mr2265001bkw.179.1259879738147; Thu, 03 Dec 2009 14:35:38 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <4ab7f8470912031433g1472b5cavfef3ec3491ff5a9e@mail.gmail.com> References: <4ab7f8470912031433g1472b5cavfef3ec3491ff5a9e@mail.gmail.com> From: Jonathan Ellis Date: Thu, 3 Dec 2009 16:35:18 -0600 Message-ID: Subject: Re: atomicity across keys and secondary index support To: cassandra-user@incubator.apache.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org that is still very firmly in the category of "future work." 2009/12/3 Patricio Echag=FCe : > Hi all, I was reading the original paper[1] looking for answers to our > problem of somehow handling transaction in Cassandra, and I read that fut= ure > works involves the ability to support atomicity across keys and secondary > index. > > does anyone has any update on that? Whatever information regarding that > topic will be really appreciated. > > thanks > > [1] Cassandra - A Decentralized Structure Storage System - Avinash Lakshm= an > (Facebook) & Prashant Malik (Facebook) > > -- > Patricio.- >