Mailing-List: contact cassandra-user-help@incubator.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: cassandra-user@incubator.apache.org
Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of dmartin.pro@gmail.com
 designates 209.85.218.210 as permitted sender)
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws;
        d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
        h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to
         :content-type;
        b=pgf8PcB3ILajqpXLZw4043f1jAWriReibftqybMvB3D65rWnRrJpnysFnZpBvK5t0a
         /p9Zz5ahj9aBgeHnJHh7IDshgE/TI9Jo9MKabOCLU4n8J9EnWutiUAbhRZ8fKrgPsuyQ
         2/Tl9dTEL3BwOAxRwrvDye7T6OJnTN70BTxQs=
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <C0B7C22F-03B6-4131-BBC7-52556D05254E@gmail.com>
References: <54eb108f0912170912u5a336572rb65fa34ec4767e95@mail.gmail.com>
	 <5ae3b19e0912171010v67960f1aq5af812faad8047c5@mail.gmail.com>
	 <54eb108f0912171048r57246e6t423b337cb9c3dc07@mail.gmail.com>
	 <828083e70912171343g1de445eds308ffac61dd571c5@mail.gmail.com>
	 <6CD06579-29A7-48CF-B61E-E9259BC84DF8@gmail.com>
	 <29578af00912171356r746bffbj540b1dc15f0765af@mail.gmail.com>
	 <C0B7C22F-03B6-4131-BBC7-52556D05254E@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 18 Dec 2009 14:30:46 +0100
Message-ID: <54eb108f0912180530m7a20e168x4a66d10c3f0b570a@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Is Cassandra suitable for multi criteria search engine
From: David MARTIN <dmartin.pro@gmail.com>
To: cassandra-user@incubator.apache.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1

Is a 3 million records set not a big deal for Solr? If I consider
about 30 properties per item, I have to give Solr 90 millions
properties to consider. Is that volume still correct for such a
solution?

And regarding lucene on top of Cassandra, can people share their feed
back, if any, about such a solution. Pros & cons vs Solr for instance.

Thank you.


2009/12/17, Jake Luciani <jakers@gmail.com>:
> True replication and scale.
>
> On Dec 17, 2009, at 4:56 PM, Josh <josh@schulzone.org> wrote:
>
>> I've used solr a bunch (And I'd cosign gabriel: Solr's fantastic) and
>> I'm trying to work my head around Cassandra, but I'm really hazy on
>> what the Cassandra+Lucene combo gives you.  What are you trying to
>> accomplish?  (Meant earnestly:  I'm really curious)
>>
>> josh
>> @schulz
>> http://schulzone.org
>>
>>
>> On Thu, Dec 17, 2009 at 2:52 PM, Jake Luciani <jakers@gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>>> You can also put lucene on top of Cassandra by using.
>>>
>>> http://github.com/tjake/Lucandra
>>>
>>> On Dec 17, 2009, at 4:43 PM, gabriele renzi <rff.rff@gmail.com>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> On Thu, Dec 17, 2009 at 7:48 PM, David MARTIN
>>>> <dmartin.pro@gmail.com>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> Hi,
>>>>> That's what I was thinking. And I'm glad to read Apache solr in
>>>>> your
>>>>> answer as it is one of my main leads.
>>>>
>>>> as a happy solr user, I second the suggestion, lucene (the
>>>> technology
>>>> behind solr) handles a number of documents like that without a
>>>> sweat,
>>>> and solr gives your replication and a few other good things.
>>>
>