Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-cassandra-user-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 17052 invoked from network); 22 Dec 2009 21:38:24 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 22 Dec 2009 21:38:24 -0000 Received: (qmail 33905 invoked by uid 500); 22 Dec 2009 21:38:23 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-cassandra-user-archive@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 33889 invoked by uid 500); 22 Dec 2009 21:38:23 -0000 Mailing-List: contact cassandra-user-help@incubator.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: cassandra-user@incubator.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list cassandra-user@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 33880 invoked by uid 99); 22 Dec 2009 21:38:23 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 22 Dec 2009 21:38:23 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.6 required=10.0 tests=SPF_NEUTRAL,SUBJECT_FUZZY_TION X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (nike.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [67.192.241.171] (HELO smtp171.dfw.emailsrvr.com) (67.192.241.171) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 22 Dec 2009 21:38:15 +0000 Received: from relay17.relay.dfw.mlsrvr.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by relay17.relay.dfw.mlsrvr.com (SMTP Server) with ESMTP id 26C802C728BD for ; Tue, 22 Dec 2009 16:37:55 -0500 (EST) Received: by relay17.relay.dfw.mlsrvr.com (Authenticated sender: eevans-AT-racklabs.com) with ESMTPSA id 1AA542C7271F for ; Tue, 22 Dec 2009 16:37:55 -0500 (EST) Subject: Re: TimeUUID Partitioning From: Eric Evans To: cassandra-user@incubator.apache.org In-Reply-To: <468b21170912221331x4ba655aev332d2c3c0e61a8e5@mail.gmail.com> References: <4B30C011.5070801@eintr.org> <1261498770.28726.28.camel@erebus.lan> <468b21170912221132m718d4f74r39daead089718bd8@mail.gmail.com> <1261511750.4006.20.camel@erebus.lan> <468b21170912221331x4ba655aev332d2c3c0e61a8e5@mail.gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Date: Tue, 22 Dec 2009 15:37:55 -0600 Message-ID: <1261517875.4006.23.camel@erebus.lan> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.28.2 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org On Tue, 2009-12-22 at 23:31 +0200, Richard Grossman wrote: > So my question might be stupid but why the timeUUID will distribute > better ? It won't, it's the same problem either way. -- Eric Evans eevans@rackspace.com