cassandra-user mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Jake Luciani <jak...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: Cassandra access control
Date Wed, 02 Dec 2009 21:53:04 GMT
Got it.

On Dec 2, 2009, at 4:42 PM, Jonathan Ellis <jbellis@gmail.com> wrote:

> It doesn't have to be the outside world, just apps from different
> groups.  Which is the whole (or at least, a major) reason we added
> multiple keyspaces.
>
> On Wed, Dec 2, 2009 at 3:38 PM, Jake Luciani <jakers@gmail.com> wrote:
>> If there is a use case to open a Cassandra cluster to the world  
>> then I
>> agree.
>>
>> Sent from my iPhone
>>
>> On Dec 2, 2009, at 4:24 PM, "Coe, Robin" <robin.coe@bluecoat.com>  
>> wrote:
>>
>>> NoSQL doesn't mean no security.  A production database engine has to
>>> protect its data.  The trick is to make the auth framework fast  
>>> enough
>>> that it doesn't adversely affect performance and robust enough  
>>> that an
>>> application requesting data doesn't have to jump through hoops to  
>>> get
>>> it.
>>>
>>> -----Original Message-----
>>> From: Jake Luciani [mailto:jakers@gmail.com]
>>> Sent: December 2, 2009 4:00 PM
>>> To: cassandra-user@incubator.apache.org
>>> Subject: Re: Cassandra access control
>>>
>>> +1 this is nosql afterall.
>>>
>>> Sent from my iPhone
>>>
>>> On Dec 2, 2009, at 3:54 PM, Mark Robson <markxr@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> How about we make authentication optional, and have the protocol
>>>> being stateful only if you want to authenticate?
>>>>
>>>> That way we don't break backwards compatibility or introduce extra
>>>> complexity for people who don't need it.
>>>>
>>>> Mark
>>

Mime
View raw message