Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-cassandra-user-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 33651 invoked from network); 6 Nov 2009 22:05:48 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 6 Nov 2009 22:05:48 -0000 Received: (qmail 73143 invoked by uid 500); 6 Nov 2009 22:05:48 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-cassandra-user-archive@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 73127 invoked by uid 500); 6 Nov 2009 22:05:48 -0000 Mailing-List: contact cassandra-user-help@incubator.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: cassandra-user@incubator.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list cassandra-user@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 73118 invoked by uid 99); 6 Nov 2009 22:05:48 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 06 Nov 2009 22:05:48 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=10.0 tests=SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of michael.greene@gmail.com designates 209.85.219.209 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.219.209] (HELO mail-ew0-f209.google.com) (209.85.219.209) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 06 Nov 2009 22:05:40 +0000 Received: by ewy5 with SMTP id 5so1456356ewy.12 for ; Fri, 06 Nov 2009 14:05:20 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=cCY80H6/lMYWO0Juq84s4AF6WzmSryF7MzUys0mq8n0=; b=D8dFPyObHKgs+n//bbHf117B8EMuoOMPcoY85pvB5uncZgIo/cepCJBQlr/531szK1 SS++nmvIF+RNEFANAAm6rA64crSQ+tnRohfqUJNnjN2jsbkgaTB6fAJX8VPVcqGqII2X sKeGU5xAn8F8s0ak7yQEE/uQiM2iaJnzhjOHY= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; b=TWtwkpUWKZXb0LwlXRyZ1YGubxEFONe7lkr1mq/PvSgqiHupGqZu/HPLr2pr8bWb3e bioY69iOkwVihfSBXvXq8vkDDLpQn5STFlCjq1nD4/Y6iLP9yC6kmdJCb1M2HniV/NTa ulpS6amploDrjLyO3pbK9haZo4sD9pIo4lu+s= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.216.88.195 with SMTP id a45mr1646194wef.63.1257545119925; Fri, 06 Nov 2009 14:05:19 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <468b21170911060854m15e280d3ubdf6892677532fee@mail.gmail.com> References: <468b21170911060854m15e280d3ubdf6892677532fee@mail.gmail.com> Date: Fri, 6 Nov 2009 16:05:19 -0600 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Time to insert bulk data is very high comparing to database From: Michael Greene To: cassandra-user@incubator.apache.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org On Fri, Nov 6, 2009 at 10:54 AM, Richard grossman wrote: > I know the test is not very accurate because the cassandra and oracle db > doesn't run on the same hardware but there is really a big difference. Do they run on comparable hardware? Hardware specs + configuration have a clear impact on Cassandra performance -- what's your environment like? This is slow even for a recent laptop though, so there's probably something else wrong. Michael