Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-cassandra-user-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 30480 invoked from network); 8 Nov 2009 03:18:00 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 8 Nov 2009 03:18:00 -0000 Received: (qmail 59483 invoked by uid 500); 8 Nov 2009 03:17:59 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-cassandra-user-archive@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 59429 invoked by uid 500); 8 Nov 2009 03:17:58 -0000 Mailing-List: contact cassandra-user-help@incubator.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: cassandra-user@incubator.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list cassandra-user@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 59420 invoked by uid 99); 8 Nov 2009 03:17:58 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sun, 08 Nov 2009 03:17:58 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=10.0 tests=SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of jbellis@gmail.com designates 74.125.78.147 as permitted sender) Received: from [74.125.78.147] (HELO ey-out-1920.google.com) (74.125.78.147) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sun, 08 Nov 2009 03:17:50 +0000 Received: by ey-out-1920.google.com with SMTP id 4so477697eyg.8 for ; Sat, 07 Nov 2009 19:17:30 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :from:date:message-id:subject:to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=zJ+CXt4iwloI6WMeeAl9oZctH4mYD19ZjR+3BczzOhk=; b=PsHdYRQVneUTaoVfukqsi7UNEeA5Ls0encbd7p6guVsxpQSg4nYv+G9A/OBO3QQKJx yWdO8HNZyHFtlIX3G4K8vXfBJUqCyL6gBttp8aQeGIEuKR8eYEiQt82RJrz3dsg3szxA lHE20WUIglk+2oRSScuS5a9KLLscHlhP/L65w= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=IFA0GRN6CZUygHJ9Zro8bvB4zmV/0KW1rQFqY8yrYlq9UUfk9w+1s5br49h1yV8aAO xtbFyL/AHAEMY6hlbSRTkbK6TVg1Eysn/wX0ce3bFdFRhlhDNNS+KHHwbyE7h7VQlucQ mpwp+d6JHeLWyER8NKOWYhSpu6OXf6zXFnUJ8= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.216.91.12 with SMTP id g12mr2169961wef.33.1257650250139; Sat, 07 Nov 2009 19:17:30 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <7FC4BE368A334142B104A2B72F4435AA045303@iizuusbs.iizuu.local> References: <7FC4BE368A334142B104A2B72F4435AA045303@iizuusbs.iizuu.local> From: Jonathan Ellis Date: Sat, 7 Nov 2009 21:17:10 -0600 Message-ID: Subject: Re: get_slice limit To: cassandra-user@incubator.apache.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org It's already described in SliceRange. (And if you give a column_names SlicePredicate instead it does not apply at all. So really SliceRange is the appropriate place to discuss it.) On Sat, Nov 7, 2009 at 8:07 PM, Christopher McKenzie wrote: > Hiya, > > I think that the limit for get_slice of 100 columns as discussed here: > http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CASSANDRA-262 ought to be disclosed = on > the api wiki page here: http://wiki.apache.org/cassandra/API? > > It sounds like an extremely important caveat to mention.=A0 Who agrees? > > ~chris.