cassandra-user mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From <cont...@shahan.me>
Subject Re: random n00b question
Date Wed, 16 Sep 2009 15:36:17 GMT
You're right! At the moment, I don't have enough users to make that
happen, but I do plan to switch to Redis, as its protocol is compatible
with memcached.

Shahan

On Tue, 15 Sep 2009 22:59:56 -0700, Chris Goffinet <goffinet@digg.com>
wrote:
> Using memcached as a write-back cache is good, using it solely for  
> sessions IMHO is bad idea. Data can be easily pushed out if your  
> thrashing the more common slabs (unless you really tuned it properly).
> 
> On Sep 15, 2009, at 10:56 PM, <contact@shahan.me> <contact@shahan.me>  
> wrote:
> 
>> Is there a specific reason to store the session data in the  
>> database? For my web-app, I use a memcached cluster, which  
>> alleviates the database load.
>>
>> Shahan
>>
>> On Tue, 15 Sep 2009 10:13:41 -0500, Jonathan Ellis
>> wrote:
>> > On Tue, Sep 15, 2009 at 10:09 AM, Mark Robson  wrote:
>> >> Even using quorum reads and writes, if a user in the same session  
>> has two
>> >> pages active at once, session data would be trashed.
>> >
>> > True.  But for most web apps I've seen, last-write-wins is just  
>> fine.
>> > YMMV. :)
>> >
>> > -Jonathan

Mime
View raw message