cassandra-user mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Mark McBride <>
Subject Re: MVCC
Date Mon, 03 Aug 2009 17:12:46 GMT
Thanks, that makes sense.  Is it an ok general rule that the
timestamps should be set to

1) The time that the data to be mutated was generated
2) The current system time if the time the data was mutated isn't available

Looking around at code it seems like time 0 is used a lot, which seems
pretty dangerous.


On Mon, Aug 3, 2009 at 10:10 AM, Wilson Mar<> wrote:
> So if different servers are not synchronized in time (to a Tier 1 time
> server), then updates from slower server will not be updated on faster
> servers?

View raw message