cassandra-user mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From mobiledream...@gmail.com
Subject Re: replica on in the beginning or added later
Date Tue, 14 Jul 2009 15:22:40 GMT
starting with replica count 2 is more prudent thanks

On Tue, Jul 14, 2009 at 8:21 AM, Jonathan Ellis <jbellis@gmail.com> wrote:

> although the repair code Stu is working on
> (https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CASSANDRA-193) could handle
> increasing the replica count, IMO there's little sense in relying any
> more on features that don't yet exist than necessary. :)
>
> On Tue, Jul 14, 2009 at 10:17 AM, <mobiledreamers@gmail.com> wrote:
> > as a followup question
> > the items we are storing are extremely valuable and we are using
> cassandra
> > as a sql replacement tool.. ie no more postgres and all data from
> cassandra,
> > given cassandra scalability
> > as we hit limits on postgres and found pgpool-II horizontal partitioning
> too
> > clunky and skype, plproxy requires too much rewiring the client code.
> > should we start with a replica factor 1 and then increase replica factor
> to
> > 2
> > or is is prudent to start with a replica factor of 2
> > Can cassandra replicate even after running for a long time with a replica
> > factor of 1, if we change the replica factor to say 2 after 2months when
> we
> > add more nodes and figure there is enough space now to replicate
> > thanks
> >
> > --
> > Bidegg worlds best auction site
> > http://bidegg.com
> >
>



-- 
Bidegg worlds best auction site
http://bidegg.com

Mime
View raw message