cassandra-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Jeff Jirsa <jji...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: Rough roadmap for 4.0
Date Tue, 08 Nov 2016 02:54:48 GMT
Also https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CASSANDRA-12676



-- 
Jeff Jirsa


> On Nov 4, 2016, at 11:51 AM, Jason Brown <jasedbrown@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> +1 to epaxos
> 
>> On Fri, Nov 4, 2016 at 11:40 AM, Jonathan Haddad <jon@jonhaddad.com> wrote:
>> 
>> epaxos would be nice, it's been about 2 years since it was started, and
>> Blake asked for a first review well over a year ago.  the benchmarks and
>> thorough test suite look like a huge improvement over the current
>> situation.
>> 
>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CASSANDRA-6246
>> 
>> On Fri, Nov 4, 2016 at 3:28 AM Edward Capriolo <edlinuxguru@gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>> 
>>> I would like to propose features around seeds:
>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CASSANDRA-12627
>>> 
>>> I have other follow up issues like getting seeds from Amazon API, or from
>>> JNDI/ DNS, etc.
>>> 
>>> I was hoping 12627 was an easy way to grease the wheels.
>>> 
>>> 
>>> On Fri, Nov 4, 2016 at 8:39 AM, Jason Brown <jasedbrown@gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>>> 
>>>> Hey Nate,
>>>> 
>>>> I'd like to add CASSANDRA-11559 (Enhance node representation) to the
>>> list,
>>>> including the comment I made on the ticket (different storage ports for
>>>> each node). For us, it's a great "would really like to have" as our
>> group
>>>> will probably need this in production within the next 1 year or less.
>>>> However since it hasn't gotten much attention, I'm not sure if we
>> should
>>>> add it to the list of "must haves" for 4.0. I'm planning on bringing it
>>> up
>>>> internally today, as well.
>>>> 
>>>> Also, from the previous 4.0 email thread that Jonathan started back in
>>> July
>>>> (
>>>> https://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/cassandra-dev/
>>>> 201607.mbox/%3CCALdd-zhW3qJ%3DOWida9nMXPj0JOsru7guOYh6-
>>>> 7uTjqEBvacrgQ%40mail.gmail.com%3E
>>>> )
>>>> 
>>>> - CASSANDRA-11115 (thrift removal) - ticket not mentioned explicitly in
>>> the
>>>> email, but the notion of removing thrift was
>>>> - CASSANDRA-10857 (Allow dropping COMPACT STORAGE flag)
>>>> 
>>>> Thanks,
>>>> 
>>>> -Jason
>>>> 
>>>> On Thu, Nov 3, 2016 at 8:43 PM, sankalp kohli <kohlisankalp@gmail.com>
>>>> wrote:
>>>> 
>>>>> List looks really good. I will let you know if there is something
>> else
>>> we
>>>>> plan to add to this list.
>>>>> 
>>>>> On Thu, Nov 3, 2016 at 7:47 PM, Nate McCall <zznate.m@gmail.com>
>>> wrote:
>>>>> 
>>>>>> It was brought up recently at the PMC level that our goals as a
>>>>>> project are not terribly clear.
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> This is a pretty good point as outside of Jira 'Fix Version'
>>> labelling
>>>>>> (which we actually suck less at compared to a lot of other ASF
>>>>>> projects) this really isnt tracked anywhere outside of general
>> tribal
>>>>>> knowledge about who is working on what.
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> I would like to see us change this for two reasons:
>>>>>> - it's important we are clear with our community about where we are
>>>> going
>>>>>> - we need to start working more closely together
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> To that end, i've put together a list (in no particular order) of
>> the
>>>>>> *major* features in which I know folks are interested, have patches
>>>>>> coming, are awaiting design review, etc.:
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> - CASSANDRA-9425 Immutable node-local schema
>>>>>> - CASSANDRA-10699 Strongly consistent schema alterations
>>>>>> - CASSANDRA-12229 NIO streaming
>>>>>> - CASSANDRA-8457 NIO messaging
>>>>>> - CASSANDRA-12345 Gossip 2.0
>>>>>> - CASSANDRA-9754 Birch trees
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> What did I miss? What else would folks like to see? Specifically,
>>> this
>>>>>> should be "new stuff that could/will break things" given we are
>>> upping
>>>>>> the major version.
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> To be clear, it's not my intention to set this in stone and then
>> beat
>>>>>> people about the head with it. More to have it there to point it
>> at a
>>>>>> high level and foster better communication with our users from the
>>>>>> perspective of an open source project.
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> Please keep in mind that given everything else going on, I think
>> it's
>>>>>> a fantastic idea to keep this list small and spend some time
>> focusing
>>>>>> on stability particularly as we transition to a new release
>> process.
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> -Nate
>>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>> 
>>> 
>> 

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, 7-Bit, 0 bytes)
View raw message