cassandra-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Nate McCall <>
Subject Re: STCS in L0 behaviour
Date Thu, 24 Nov 2016 20:53:33 GMT
> The reason is described here:
> /Marcus

"...a lot of the work you've done you will redo when you compact your now
bigger L0 sstable against L1."

^ Sylvain's hypothesis (next comment down) is actually something we see
occasionally in practice: having to re-write the contents of L1 too often
when large L0 SSTables are pulled in. Here is an example we took on a
system with pending compaction spikes that was seeing this specific issue
with four LCS-based tables:

The significant part of this particular workload is a burst of heavy writes
from long-duration scheduled jobs.

  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message