Return-Path: X-Original-To: archive-asf-public-internal@cust-asf2.ponee.io Delivered-To: archive-asf-public-internal@cust-asf2.ponee.io Received: from cust-asf.ponee.io (cust-asf.ponee.io [163.172.22.183]) by cust-asf2.ponee.io (Postfix) with ESMTP id EEC19200B8C for ; Mon, 12 Sep 2016 08:27:52 +0200 (CEST) Received: by cust-asf.ponee.io (Postfix) id ED44A160AC8; Mon, 12 Sep 2016 06:27:52 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: archive-asf-public@cust-asf.ponee.io Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by cust-asf.ponee.io (Postfix) with SMTP id 41E88160AB8 for ; Mon, 12 Sep 2016 08:27:52 +0200 (CEST) Received: (qmail 4891 invoked by uid 500); 12 Sep 2016 06:27:46 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@cassandra.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: dev@cassandra.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list dev@cassandra.apache.org Received: (qmail 4874 invoked by uid 99); 12 Sep 2016 06:27:45 -0000 Received: from pnap-us-west-generic-nat.apache.org (HELO spamd2-us-west.apache.org) (209.188.14.142) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 12 Sep 2016 06:27:45 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by spamd2-us-west.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at spamd2-us-west.apache.org) with ESMTP id 7851A1A007B for ; Mon, 12 Sep 2016 06:27:45 +0000 (UTC) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at spamd2-us-west.apache.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: 1.429 X-Spam-Level: * X-Spam-Status: No, score=1.429 tagged_above=-999 required=6.31 tests=[DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_ENVFROM_END_DIGIT=0.25, HTML_MESSAGE=2, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=disabled Authentication-Results: spamd2-us-west.apache.org (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com Received: from mx1-lw-eu.apache.org ([10.40.0.8]) by localhost (spamd2-us-west.apache.org [10.40.0.9]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id gqD28Zb774LJ for ; Mon, 12 Sep 2016 06:27:44 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-oi0-f46.google.com (mail-oi0-f46.google.com [209.85.218.46]) by mx1-lw-eu.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at mx1-lw-eu.apache.org) with ESMTPS id BFCC15FBBC for ; Mon, 12 Sep 2016 06:27:43 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-oi0-f46.google.com with SMTP id y2so292571123oie.0 for ; Sun, 11 Sep 2016 23:27:43 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=hc5Xy0ddc91+yybwy3PWpYFBPFlimoG6cWvNd22QQsc=; b=uRdb/u+6XqenPIb9SwbrmL4NJhsF4Gl0FvZeG4ohdoaP+mgrYXIQ2s0KrOzGAMIFWL z10geH6ND36ClpnXLzYwBd5xUsjnX6+4m6Qi2n0Oj1DehNqtnRjHgl9zclnFp+Oix+JR GyVncGZDOzcSqVmsHnK6cvg6G0qYTVeHzjRmQfJlwt4ty5wXLrmCwSJNKDQuxdZ3tA61 cAX41fMoS84eicRMv+cMlRaD67A5/IGGqUhvZV19KlrOnT01va0aQ1BtUOcnbkl1TGQ4 XxOI2nDIcjF4Y7z5akeYkXQcLdXWDCijLzcSD6XYUCE+xYsQ0IuM3wzxWQez2EHiwBLp bIPw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to; bh=hc5Xy0ddc91+yybwy3PWpYFBPFlimoG6cWvNd22QQsc=; b=MmL5UYBZ+NgF6Slz5/5fuopZtMs9Yd4be72gtSwtqdAOJiagOolWyLlPygrDsPjt6f GBcW7gYHpoycU+450iRRYknmVFJJuuFiMJg55gIZ5KX++38yTmxze3Udh0BYVOo2uI6Z tHl/mG5Z0VGKYDUfdNvruG2PGdvwWz2G3BlazM17zV6/BaphGxaWqoXCT54iJBrDRuWe dEyNnk/pfHbDm/LJDb/AMuGWDmRqPsaYBTQC40mYTKmGcmuzIez0XKgQXvvf53trQbD6 FdFGfbzbt3sQ2AUXWV9D7ezn3i21xdrI3oQRTutXJnp5iOB6w/pAMAjk80Gip0jIVRQH AScg== X-Gm-Message-State: AE9vXwOV5cwgXxdp+GOzS2KJr3qUDZZlg9qxyEExRqjuZb9CU6cf4V2piLFdn+l5+wCxk61Hw/CXxY/Se4SohA== X-Received: by 10.202.50.134 with SMTP id y128mr23074427oiy.136.1473661657223; Sun, 11 Sep 2016 23:27:37 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.36.140.141 with HTTP; Sun, 11 Sep 2016 23:27:16 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: From: Dikang Gu Date: Sun, 11 Sep 2016 23:27:16 -0700 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Can we change the number of vnodes on existing nodes? To: dev@cassandra.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001a113ce134991c98053c49974f archived-at: Mon, 12 Sep 2016 06:27:53 -0000 --001a113ce134991c98053c49974f Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Thanks for the suggestions! I may consider the new dc solution, although it would involve significant operational work in our scale. For gossip issue, like: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CASSANDRA-11709, https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CASSANDRA-11740 On Fri, Sep 9, 2016 at 9:55 PM, Brandon Williams wrote: > I am curious exactly what gossip issues you are encountering. > > On Fri, Sep 9, 2016 at 7:45 PM, Dikang Gu wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > We have some big cluster (500+ nodes), they have 256 vnodes on physical > > host, which is causing a lot of problems to us, especially make the > gossip > > to be in-efficient. > > > > There seems no way to change the number of vnodes on existing nodes, is > > there any reason that we can not support it? It should not be too > different > > from moving the node with one single token, right? > > > > Thanks > > Dikang > > > -- Dikang --001a113ce134991c98053c49974f--